Is SR an approximation or a special case?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vorde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation Sr
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Special Relativity (SR) is both an approximation and a special case of General Relativity (GR). In regions of spacetime small enough to neglect tidal effects, SR serves as an excellent approximation to GR. While SR is often associated with inertial reference frames, it is not limited to them; accelerated motion and non-inertial frames can also be analyzed within SR. Mathematically, SR can be derived from GR under specific conditions, as it represents a solution to the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) in a flat spacetime where the curvature is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Field Equations (EFE)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of spacetime and curvature
  • Knowledge of inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Basic principles of Special Relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Special Relativity from General Relativity
  • Explore the implications of curvature in spacetime
  • Learn about accelerated motion in Special Relativity
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of flat versus curved spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of relativity and the relationship between Special and General Relativity.

Vorde
Messages
786
Reaction score
0
I was having this debate with a friend, and I wanted to know if I was correct. My friend was saying that SR is an approximation for GR (albeit a very good one) with the specific conditions of only inertial reference frames, and I was saying that SR is exactly accurate with GR, and so is directly solvable from GR with those conditions made (doesn't matter if you can actually reduce GR mathematically to SR, just that logically you can).

Am I right?

Edit: I guess I can appendix this with another related question: can you mathematically reduce GR to SR?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vorde said:
I was having this debate with a friend, and I wanted to know if I was correct. My friend was saying that SR is an approximation for GR (albeit a very good one) with the specific conditions of only inertial reference frames, and I was saying that SR is exactly accurate with GR, and so is directly solvable from GR with those conditions made (doesn't matter if you can actually reduce GR mathematically to SR, just that logically you can).

Am I right?

Edit: I guess I can appendix this with another related question: can you mathematically reduce GR to SR?
Actually, the answer to the question in the title is that both are correct. In a region of spacetime small enough to neglect tidal effects SR is a good approximation to GR. SR is also a special case of GR, specifically a solution to the EFE with no stress energy anywhere.

However, it seems like you may be under the mistaken impression that SR is restricted to inertial frames only. That is not the case. You can analyze accelerated motion or use non-inertial frames in SR just fine. All that you cannot do in SR is treat gravity. See:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/acceleration.html
 
Last edited:
SR is just the case of a flat space-time. Or put mathematically, the curvature of space is zero.

It is just as exact as general relativity, but like DaleSpam said locally a curved space can be approximated by a flat one. Think of tangent planes to curved surfaces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K