Is Star Formation Just a Matter of Lag Time?

AI Thread Summary
Star formation is not merely a matter of lag time in receiving light; it involves observable processes such as gas clouds condensing and stars forming in clusters. Historical records show that stars do not suddenly appear without prior existence. Observations reveal a continuum of stellar development, from collapsing gas disks to dying stars. The understanding of star formation relies on extensive data and mathematical modeling, allowing scientists to piece together the life cycle of stars. Overall, star formation is a complex process that unfolds over significant time scales, rather than a simple visual phenomenon.
thomasxc
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
it is known that there is considerable lag time when light travels from some place and reached us her on earth. is it possible that what we consider to be star formation actually nothing more than us receiving their light for the first time? thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, because we see stars condensing out of gas clouds, eating up the disk of gas surrounding them, moving together in young star clusters, and dispersing as the star clusters age. Stars don't just pop out of nowhere.
 
To my knowledge, we have not actually experienced any (or, at least, many) cases of stars suddenly shining where there was no star before in recorded history. This would be a misconception.

That is not how we learn about star formation. It happens over much longer time scales than we humans have been around.



As ideasrule points out, when we look out into the universe, we see millions upon millions of stars in various stages of development, from collapsing disks of dust and gas, all the way to exploding novae, all the way to burnt-out cool cinders.

In a sense, we have millions upon millions of "frames" in the "film" that is a typical star's life. All we have to do is put them in the right order.

That's how we know how stars form.

Well, that and all the math stuff...
 
okay.that makes sense.thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top