Is String Theory the Future of Physics?

AI Thread Summary
String theory is a theoretical framework in physics that seeks to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics by proposing that the universe's fundamental components are one-dimensional strings rather than particles. These strings vibrate at different frequencies, which account for the various particles and forces observed. Despite generating significant interest and research, string theory remains unproven and controversial within the scientific community. Numerous resources, including books and articles, are available for those seeking more information. However, the theory is still evolving, and there is no consensus on its validity among physicists.
daodude1987
"String Theory" in Physics?

Do any of you guys know anything about or where I can find information about the "string theory" in physics? I can't find any information on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You couldn't have looked very hard. I just punched "string theory" into google & got 309,000 hits in .13 seconds.
 


String theory is a theoretical framework in physics that attempts to reconcile two major theories of the universe: general relativity and quantum mechanics. It proposes that the fundamental building blocks of the universe are not particles, but one-dimensional strings that vibrate at different frequencies, giving rise to all the particles and forces we observe. It is a highly complex and controversial theory, and while it has not yet been proven, it has generated a lot of interest and research in the scientific community. You can find more information about string theory in various books, articles, and online resources. However, it is important to note that string theory is still a work in progress and there is no consensus on its validity among physicists.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Ball on a string thrown around a spool
Replies
3
Views
835
Length of string in a standing wave
Replies
19
Views
1K
Circle approximation of a wave pulse on a string or spring
Replies
29
Views
1K
How much funding/resources are spent in string theory research?
Replies
14
Views
2K
How can I pluck strings (with changing length) with constant energy?
Replies
1
Views
966
Force pulling on a string at an angle with a block at the other end
Replies
2
Views
1K
Effect of temperature on vibrational frequency of a violin string
Replies
5
Views
2K
Bead on a rod which is being pulled by an ideal string with velocity v
Replies
27
Views
941
Conservation of power in a traveling wave on a string
Replies
9
Views
2K
Conservation of String Exercise
Replies
5
Views
668

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top