Schools Is taking a long break before starting graduate school a potential disadvantage?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the potential impact of a significant gap between undergraduate and graduate studies, specifically regarding a 5-6 year commitment to the Navy as a nuclear trained officer. The original poster, who graduated in 2006 and plans to start graduate school in physics in 2011, expresses concern about the long break from academia and whether it will hinder their ability to succeed in advanced studies. They mention their life experiences during the gap, including marriage, raising a child, and working as an accountant, but question their retention of knowledge from their undergraduate studies. The conversation highlights the challenges of transitioning back into a rigorous academic environment after a lengthy absence, particularly when the intervening years involved non-technical work. The poster seeks reassurance and insights from others who may have faced similar situations.
anonymity
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
I made a post a day or two ago, but got no responses. This post is a simplification.

How long is too long to take off in between undergraduate study and graduate study?

I want to join the navy as a nuclear trained officer, but this would entail a 5-6 year obligation. Could this amount of time away from academia be a potential problem for a graduate student?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anonymity said:
I made a post a day or two ago, but got no responses. This post is a simplification.

How long is too long to take off in between undergraduate study and graduate study?

I want to join the navy as a nuclear trained officer, but this would entail a 5-6 year obligation. Could this amount of time away from academia be a potential problem for a graduate student?

I graduated with my bachelor's degree in 2006; I will be starting grad school in physics this fall (2011). :smile:
 
what have you been doing since 2006?
 
anonymity said:
what have you been doing since 2006?

Marriage, kid, follow my better half around the country, post-doc to post-doc until we finally settled someplace semi-permanently. And I worked, too, as an accountant.
 
Woo. Things may not be so bleak after all.

There's no way that you remember everything you learned, though...you know? Aren't you at all concerned about this?

Jumping right into some advanced analysis or combinatorics (or, if you're not going to be studying math, something equally specialized) after doing nothing but basic accounting mathematics for six years just doesn't seem practical to me, or is this something I shouldn't be concerned about?

My time in the navy will be largely non-technical. I will be in a class-room setting learning all of the basic nuclear propulsion theory for 18 months or so, but the rest of my time will be as a line-officer on a sub, not as an engineer, in the technical sense, but as an officer overseeing the sub and the sub's reactors and the crew.

(Congrats, too, old man Geezer -- five years late, but hey, what can you do? lol).

Anyone else?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top