Is the Answer Correct? Dipping a Cylinder w/ Small Hole in Liquid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the maximum depth a cylindrical vessel with a small hole can be submerged in a liquid before it fills with liquid, given the formula √(2S/rdg) for the maximum depth. Participants express differing opinions on the correctness of the formula, with some asserting that it seems accurate while others challenge the presence of the square root, questioning the dimensional consistency of the equation. The debate highlights confusion regarding how the square root factor is derived in this context. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on the underlying physics and mathematics involved in the problem. The correctness of the provided answer remains contested.
dk_ch
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
An empty cylindrical vessel with a small circular hole of radius r at the bottom is dipped vertically in a liquid of density d keeping the bottom downward. At what maximum depth can it be dipped before the liquid enters into it? The surface tension of the liquid is S. The answer given in the text is √(2S/rdg). Is the answer correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dk_ch said:
An empty cylindrical vessel with a small circular hole of radius r at the bottom is dipped vertically in a liquid of density d keeping the bottom downward. At what maximum depth can it be dipped before the liquid enters into it? The surface tension of the liquid is S. The answer given in the text is √(2S/rdg). Is the answer correct?


It seems correct to me.
 
sankalpmittal said:
It seems correct to me.

Sir will u please explain How?
How does square root arise here?
 
dk_ch said:
Sir will u please explain How?
How does square root arise here?


Square root. Then it is wrong. Please check the dimensions. Dimensions are consistent if there were no square root.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top