Is the Answer in Meters per Second or Millimeters per Second?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcramps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of units in fluid dynamics, specifically whether to express velocity in meters per second (m/s) or millimeters per second (mm/s). The continuity equation A1*v1=A2*v2 is applied, with an example involving a radius of 10.0 mm and a velocity of 0.200 m/s. Participants confirm that converting all measurements to meters is essential for accuracy, and that the final answer can be converted back to millimeters if needed. The importance of significant figures in calculations is also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics and the continuity equation
  • Knowledge of significant figures in measurements
  • Ability to convert between metric units (meters and millimeters)
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the continuity equation in various fluid dynamics scenarios
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific calculations
  • Explore unit conversion techniques between metric units
  • Review algebraic methods for solving equations involving multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching fluid dynamics, and professionals involved in calculations requiring unit conversions and accuracy in measurements.

dcramps
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Units -- is this m/s or mm/s?

Homework Statement


N/A

Homework Equations


Continuity
A1*v1=A2*v2

A=pi*r²

The Attempt at a Solution



I've solved a problem as follows

(pi * 10.0mm²)(0.200m/s)=(pi * 2.50mm²)(v2)
3.20 xx/s = v2

I am pretty sure it's in m/s, but having the radii in millimeters is confusing me. I would convert all to meters, but I am required to solve using 3sf, so I would lose accuracy on the 2.50mm.

Am I correct in thinking the answer is in m/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can never lose accuracy by converting millimeters to meters, and vice-versa, since the two are separated by a constant. You have the right idea - turn everything into meters, and if you want, you can turn the end product back into millimeters.
 


Heh, I converted 2.50mm to 0.025m and, for whatever reason, I got the idea in my head that I would have to reduce it to 0.020m to still have 3sf. I went back and did a bit of review on sf and figured it out :p

Thanks for the response!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K