I Is the Blade Loading Sufficient for Minimum Sliding Resistance at Top Speed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around assessing whether the blade loading of a model, designed to measure air resistance on ice, is sufficient to minimize sliding resistance at high speeds. The model features three stainless steel blades, each 30 cm long and 1 mm thick, with a top speed of 90 kph and a calculated loading of 0.67 kg/cm². The user is considering adjusting the weight or blade lengths to optimize performance. They acknowledge the importance of pressure between the blades and the ice, as well as the impact of ice temperature. The user plans to enhance the model by adding pressure sensors to each blade for more accurate readings.
Colin Wilson
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
I'm building a model as shown below (side, front, back). In order to measure its air resistance I will be mounting it on temporary ice blades (Green) and driving it down a long skating rink. The model has a pressure sensor incorporated into the motor / propeller assembly and a GPS unit to measure velocity, a microcontroller collects the data (pressure / velocity) and writes it to an SD card. As it sits the blade loading would be as follows:
  • (3) SS blades = 30cm long * 1mm thick
  • Top speed 90kph (82fps)
  • Loading 2kg per blade = 0.67kg / cm2
My question: Is the blade loading high enough given the top speed to ensure minimum sliding resistance? I can add more weight to the model or I can reduce the blade lengths.
DB Slim Test Sled Side.jpg
DB Slim Body Front.jpg
DB Slim Test Sled Back.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I searched ice skate friction, and found myself traveling down a rabbit hole of interesting information. But I did not find an answer to your question. You apparently already understand that pressure between the skate blades and the ice is a key variable, as is also the ice temperature.

I suggest that you treat the blade loading as an experimental variable, and run a series of experiments to optimize it.
 
  • Like
Likes Colin Wilson
Thank you for your input.
In any case woke up this morning and decided to put pressure sensors on each blade and subtract those readings from the motor reading so problem solved!
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top