Is the Book's Answer Correct for This Circuit Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingNothing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a circuit problem from a book, where the book states the answer is 4.7 ohms, but the participants calculate different values, primarily 4.33 ohms and 4.55 ohms. Confusion arises from the circuit diagram, with participants debating the correct interpretation of the resistors' arrangement and whether any resistors are counted twice. After breaking down the circuit into parts, one participant clarifies their approach, leading to a consensus that their calculations yield 4.55 ohms, which is still not matching the book's answer. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting circuit diagrams and calculations in solving electrical problems.
KingNothing
Messages
880
Reaction score
4
Hey everyone, this is a problem straight from my book. It's an odd number, so the book has the answer in the back: 4.7 ohms

The setup is near impossible to explain, so I've attached a diagram of the setup. Basically, it is a circuit with some resistors (represented by squiggly lines) each with R=2.8 kilo-ohms.

I came up with:
R=(\frac{1}{3*2.8}+\frac{1}{2*2.8}+\frac{1}{2.8})^-1+2.8=4.33\Omega
The -1 right after the frist parentheses is a ^-1, it's kind of hard to tell.
Did I do it wrong? Is the book wrong? Is it just a case where they rounded and I didnt?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the diagram you posted is correct? Your equation has 7 resistors but I see only 6 in the diagram.
 
Yes, I'm fully aware of that...you see, I figured that if it exits the smaller line there on the bottom, and travels up to the intersection, that if it took either of the two uppermost paths (speaking literally according to diagram) that it would have to pass through the upper resistor on the right side, so I accounted for that twice. What is the proper way to do this?
 
The two in the top left are in series, and are in parallel with the diagonal. That grouping is in series with the top one on the right. That whole grouping is in parallel with the middle one. Then that whole thing is in series with the bottom one on the right.
 
It certainly doesn't go through any resistor twice.

First I'd re-draw the diagram to make it less confusing. Then I think the solution is pretty easy. But I don't get your book's answer either. I get 4.55 \Omega
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    684 bytes · Views: 491
I get 4.55

I broke it into 3 parts.
1. solve for 4 top resistors (as a parallel circuit)
2. solve for the middle resistor in parallel with the top 4
3. add the 1 resistor in series

Here is what the top 4 resistors are like, I think.

2.8 + [2.8^{-1} + [(2)(2.8)]^{-1}]^{-1}

Now write that as A in your calculator. Trying to sub that into an even more complicated equation will just cause problems.

Now here is what the parallel portion of the entire circuit looks like

[2.8^{-1} + A^{-1}]^{-1}

Now add the series portion which is just 2.8

R = 2.8 + [2.8^{-1} + A^{-1}]^{-1}

R = 4.55
 
Thank you everyone...I can't tell you how relieving it is to see exactly what I did wrong. It's such a great feeling! Thank you a ton Shawn and enigma and gnome. I got 4.55 as well.
 
Back
Top