Is the Center of Mass Also the Midpoint of a Triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparkzbarca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the midpoint of a triangle, with a focus on whether it is the same as the center of mass or centroid. The original poster believes that the intersection of lines from each vertex to the midpoints of the opposite sides defines the midpoint of the triangle. Responses clarify that this point is indeed the centroid, which can be constructed using only two of the three lines. Additionally, the conversation highlights that there are multiple definitions of a triangle's midpoint, emphasizing the importance of context in mathematical terminology. The center of mass of a uniform triangle aligns with the centroid, which is relevant for applications like computer modeling.
sparkzbarca
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I blieve the mid point in space of arbitrary triangle formed by points A,B,C

is the point at which the line

A -> midpoint(B,C)
B -> midpoint (A,C)
C ->midpoint (A,B)

meet
(i also think C is redundant, that where A to mid and B to mid cross is basically the mid point of
the whole triangle)

Is my math right?

I can't seem to get a clear answer on google

this is for taking a computer model of a shape and finding the midpoint of one face of the model.
(the faces of course are made by connecting points into triangles)
As such it needs to be for an arbitrary triangle (not right angle only for example)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What's your definition of the "midpoint" of a triangle? You seem to mean the centroid, but did you know there are three other concepts that could equally validly be called the "midpoint" of a triangle?

See: http://www.mathopenref.com/triangleincenter.html (read that bit about "summary of triangle centres")

If you meant the centroid, yes, that's the way of constructing it, and only 2 of those lines are necessary to define it (the third line will intersect at the same point). The centroid is the most relevant to physical problems like finding the centre of mass of a triangular lamina, so if this is what you're doing, then you're on the right track.
 
Curious3141 said:
What's your definition of the "midpoint" of a triangle? You seem to mean the centroid, but did you know there are three other concepts that could equally validly be called the "midpoint" of a triangle?

I don't really want to hijack this thread, but there are 5427 possible notions of the center of a triangle :biggrin:
See http://faculty.evansville.edu/ck6/encyclopedia/ETC.html
 
micromass said:
I don't really want to hijack this thread, but there are 5427 possible notions of the center of a triangle :biggrin:
See http://faculty.evansville.edu/ck6/encyclopedia/ETC.html

Whoa. You mathematician types obviously have nothing but time on your hands...or in your case, flippers, since you're a walrus. :smile:
 
Oops

"I can't seem to get a clear answer on google".

Well, I tried for myself, using "midpoint of triangle" for searching.

Lots of results.
 
If you imagine the triangle as a piece of perfectly uniform cardboard, then the mid point you are speaking of is the center of mass of the triangle.

Suspend the triangle by a vertex in a gravitational field and let it hang freely . A plumb line dropped from the vertex will pass through the center of mass (center of gravity) for other wise the center of mass would exert a torque on the vertex. Since this is true starting from any vertex, the three plumb lines must intersect at the center of mass.

You are right that you only need two of these lines to find this point.

Can you show that this three sides are intersected at their midpoints?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top