Is the Charge of a Positron the Same as a Proton?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dleacock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antiparticles
dleacock
I was reading that the antiparticle of a particle is the same, except it has an opposite charge, which cancels it out. if the charge of an electron is -1.60 x 10^-19, would that make the charge of the positron +1.60 x 10^-19? but isn't that also the charge of the proton? I must be missing something...:rolleyes:

thanks
dleacock
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Positron and proton have the same charge. The main difference is in mass and also composition. Positron is elementary while proton consists of 3 quarks (2 up and 1 down) held together by gluons.
 
I've also heard a positron be called a electron moving backwards in time, or something similar like that. What is it about the property of an antipartcile that cancels out the particle, just its charge?

thanks
 
Particle moving backward in time is a way to visualize antiparticle. (according to many leading physicsts, nobody really understands quantum theory).
When a particle colides with its antiparticle, they both disappear into a burst of energy (two gamma rays usually). It has nothing to do with charge - neutron plus antineutron leads to the same result.
 
dleacock said:
What is it about the property of an antipartcile that cancels out the particle, just its charge?

As far as I know, there are three properties that are "opposite" in antiparticles:

the electric charge, which determines the nature of the electric force on the particle.

the "color charge," which determines the nature of the strong interaction between two particles (i.e. there are red, green and blue quarks, and anti-red, anti-green and anti-blue antiquarks).

The "flavor" which determines the nature of the weak interaction between two particles. For example, it's what distinguishes an electron, a muon and a tau; or an electron-neutrino, muon-neutrino, and a tau-neutrino. An electron can interact to produce an electron-neutrino but not an anti-electron-neutrino, or a muon-neutrino, or a tau-neutrino.
 
jtbell said:
As far as I know, there are three properties that are "opposite" in antiparticles:

the electric charge, which determines the nature of the electric force on the particle.

the "color charge," which determines the nature of the strong interaction between two particles (i.e. there are red, green and blue quarks, and anti-red, anti-green and anti-blue antiquarks).

The "flavor" which determines the nature of the weak interaction between two particles. For example, it's what distinguishes an electron, a muon and a tau; or an electron-neutrino, muon-neutrino, and a tau-neutrino. An electron can interact to produce an electron-neutrino but not an anti-electron-neutrino, or a muon-neutrino, or a tau-neutrino.

JT, isn't the spin (chirality) backward too? Aren't antiparticles "CPT Pairs"?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top