Is the Chart Box Plan Feasible for Utilizing Telephone Line Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrMedeco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Work
AI Thread Summary
The feasibility of the "chart box" plan for utilizing telephone line power is questioned due to its simplistic design and low voltage DC limitations. While there is power on telephone lines, estimates suggest that the voltage is typically around 40V, with 90V during ringing, which may not provide sufficient energy for practical applications. Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the components listed, particularly regarding fuses and the absence of voltage regulation methods like zener circuits. Users agree that while minor power can be drawn for small tasks, significant energy extraction could lead to damaging phone company infrastructure. Overall, the consensus is that the proposed method lacks practicality and safety.
MrMedeco
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am a beginning electronics hobbiest who needs a quick answer. My question is, would these plans for a "chart box" really work?

http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/BOXES/chartreu.box

If not, would there be other possibilities that will work? The main purpose of the chart box is too leech electricity from the telephone line and apply it to whatever you need it for.
I don't think this will work, as the plan seems way too simple and your dealing with low voltage DC. However, I would like a professional opinion. Any insight into this is greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is simple conservation of energy. Power output !> power input. Dinky 24 gauge wires don't seem to lend themselves to great power transmission do they?

Reminds me of the time I read about compromising the network of a large retail chain's computers using the handheld scanners in the stores. Since I worked at HQ I knew the equipment in question and the article was quite amusing in how far off it was from reality. Had the author actually accomplished 1/10th their objective, along the way they would have realized their mistakes in their 'theory' and found a MUCH easier method.

Cliff
 
- The parts list smells suspicious, but perhaps I just never ran into a fuse specified for a voltage (I always dealt with fuses with current specifications).

- It says you can get more voltage if you use a transformer, but I'm pretty sure that these lines are primarily DC, so you would need to supplement the transformer with a switcher.

- The basic (and I do mean basic) idea behind the design is reasonable. Obviously, there is power delivered over the phone line, otherwise all phones would need to be plugged into a 120 outlet. From my experience working in the telecom industry, the voltage in the phone line is ~130 V (I'm pretty sure that's constant, though it may just be upon ring). In principle, you should be able to drive a load in parallel to the line, but as has been mentioned, I don't believe you will get much power. The description (if not the design itself) given on that web page is very sloppy.
 
Last edited:
I'm rather sure the normal voltage supplied to a phone is 40V, and 90V on ring.

I agree with all of the above -- you could certainly leech some power (to light the buttons on your handset, for example), but you wouldn't be able to leech much. At some point you'd blow one of the phone company's fuses.

- Warren
 
I'm not surprised that I am mistaken. I can't remember where that 130 V figure came from; somewhere in the lab I'm sure. I definitely remember a 48 V ((ter)) ((min)) ((al)). Anyway, I think it would be a much better design to use a voltage regulator circuit, or at least a zener circuit. The rheostat would kill the output impedance (assuming it's even good to begin with, which I imagine is not true).
 
turin said:
- The parts list smells suspicious, but perhaps I just never ran into a fuse specified for a voltage (I always dealt with fuses with current specifications).

How could a fuse ever be setup to blow at a certain voltage level for protection without knowing the load or current? The lack of mentioning using something like a zener or linear regulator in the author's text tells the tale...

Huh, I didn't know it was 90V at ring, maybe time to get out the scope and call myself! :smile:

Cliff
 
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...

Similar threads

Back
Top