Is the Complex Direct Stress Equation Correctly Simplified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechaman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Stress
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simplification of the Complex Direct Stress Equation, specifically the transformation of δn.|AB| = δx.|BC|.cosΘ into δn = δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB|. Participants clarify that the entire δx.|BC|.cosΘ is divided by |AB|, not just the |BC| part. Additionally, the boxed equation δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB| simplifies to δxcos²Θ, which is derived using trigonometric identities rather than calculus. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding coordinate transformations and equilibrium in stress analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, particularly cosine functions.
  • Familiarity with stress analysis concepts, including Mohr's Circle.
  • Basic knowledge of equilibrium principles in mechanics.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Mohr's Circle for plane stress.
  • Learn about coordinate transformations in stress analysis.
  • Review trigonometric identities and their applications in engineering.
  • Explore equilibrium equations in mechanics for better understanding of forces.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, particularly those in structural and mechanical fields, students studying mechanics of materials, and anyone involved in stress analysis and trigonometric applications in engineering problems.

Mechaman
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Attached image with problem.
IMAG0038_1.jpg

2 Questions;

1.
δn.|AB| = δx.|BC|.cosΘ
becomes
δn = δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB|

This is dividing the entire "δx.|BC|.cosΘ" equation by |AB| or just the |BC| part? Is there a difference?

2.
Half way down page, boxed equation. How does δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB| = δxcos^2Θ and then 1/2(δx+δy)
Is this calculus? Should I find this in a log table I've been searching but haven't found where to look this up.

Thanks for any help.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mechaman said:
Attached image with problem.
View attachment 89360
2 Questions;

1.
δn.|AB| = δx.|BC|.cosΘ
becomes
δn = δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB|

This is dividing the entire "δx.|BC|.cosΘ" equation by |AB| or just the |BC| part? Is there a difference?

It's simple trig. |BC| / |AB| = cos (θ)
2.
Half way down page, boxed equation. How does δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB| = δxcos^2Θ and then 1/2(δx+δy)
Is this calculus? Should I find this in a log table I've been searching but haven't found where to look this up.

A log table? No, it's not calculus, either. It has more to do with transforming coordinates and using trig identities than with anything exotic like log tables or calculus.

You can find a derivation for these formulas along with discussions on deriving Mohr's circle for plane stress.

https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/structge/mohrcirc.htm

The basic idea is to assume the wedge is in equilibrium and to calculate the forces which keep it in equilibrium from the stresses on the sides of the wedge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mechaman
Thanks I understand the first part now I have the double angle forumula.

I partly understand the second part until the last factoring:

δx(1+cos2θ)1/2 + δy(1-cos2θ)1/2
1/2(δx+δy) + 1/2(δx-δy)cos2θ

I know this type of factoring looks familiar its been a while since I've done this type of stuff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
24K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K