Is the conservation of energy a statistical phenomena?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the conservation of energy is a fundamental law or a statistical phenomenon. It presents scenarios where heat transfer could occur randomly, suggesting that improbable events might lead to temporary violations of energy conservation. The conversation also touches on quantum mechanics, where particle behavior could theoretically result in energy conservation violations, albeit with extremely low probability. The second law of thermodynamics is identified as a statistical law that can be violated, particularly in smaller systems. Ultimately, the relationship between energy violations and time is framed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Suppose you build a heat engine. On one side you have a hot body, on the other side you have a cold body. Between the 2 you have the heat engine but on a parallel path you have a simple heat conductor.

What will happen is that some of the heat will travel through and power the heat engine and some will travel through the heat conductor and do nothing until the 2 bodies are at the same temperature, but heat is just the magnitude of the random motions of atoms/molecules. It seems like it would be possible for random motions to result in heat transfer through the conductor until the hot body is hot again and the cold body is cold again, by pure chance. This would be so improbable that it would likely never be observed happening but I can't see a reason that it should be impossible.


Another scenario where extremely unlikely events could result in a violation of conservation of energy would be on the quantum level. It is my understanding that any given particle has a certain amount of inherent uncertainty in its position and momentum. If a significant percentage of an objects particles spontaneously and simultaneously decided they were going to exist a meter further up the gravity well from their current position that would be observed as a violation of the law of conservation of energy. Again, such an event would be so improbable that it would likely never be observed but improbable does not equal impossible.

So, as the title states, is the law of conservation of energy a fundamental law or the result of statistical probability?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first case, energy is conserved, but the second law of thermodynamics is not, and yes, the second law is a statistical law, it can be violated. The larger your system is, the less the fluctuations are percentage-wise. For most macroscopic situations the level of fluctuations is usually negligible, but if you are studying Brownian motion, for example, they will not be ignorable.

In the second case, yes, energy conservation can be violated but only for a certain amount of time. The relationship between the amount of energy violation and the time interval over which it occurs is given by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top