Is the conservation of energy a statistical phenomena?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the conservation of energy is a fundamental law or a statistical phenomenon. It presents scenarios where heat transfer could occur randomly, suggesting that improbable events might lead to temporary violations of energy conservation. The conversation also touches on quantum mechanics, where particle behavior could theoretically result in energy conservation violations, albeit with extremely low probability. The second law of thermodynamics is identified as a statistical law that can be violated, particularly in smaller systems. Ultimately, the relationship between energy violations and time is framed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Suppose you build a heat engine. On one side you have a hot body, on the other side you have a cold body. Between the 2 you have the heat engine but on a parallel path you have a simple heat conductor.

What will happen is that some of the heat will travel through and power the heat engine and some will travel through the heat conductor and do nothing until the 2 bodies are at the same temperature, but heat is just the magnitude of the random motions of atoms/molecules. It seems like it would be possible for random motions to result in heat transfer through the conductor until the hot body is hot again and the cold body is cold again, by pure chance. This would be so improbable that it would likely never be observed happening but I can't see a reason that it should be impossible.


Another scenario where extremely unlikely events could result in a violation of conservation of energy would be on the quantum level. It is my understanding that any given particle has a certain amount of inherent uncertainty in its position and momentum. If a significant percentage of an objects particles spontaneously and simultaneously decided they were going to exist a meter further up the gravity well from their current position that would be observed as a violation of the law of conservation of energy. Again, such an event would be so improbable that it would likely never be observed but improbable does not equal impossible.

So, as the title states, is the law of conservation of energy a fundamental law or the result of statistical probability?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first case, energy is conserved, but the second law of thermodynamics is not, and yes, the second law is a statistical law, it can be violated. The larger your system is, the less the fluctuations are percentage-wise. For most macroscopic situations the level of fluctuations is usually negligible, but if you are studying Brownian motion, for example, they will not be ignorable.

In the second case, yes, energy conservation can be violated but only for a certain amount of time. The relationship between the amount of energy violation and the time interval over which it occurs is given by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top