Is the Cubic Function Inversely Symmetric about its Point of Inflection?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cubic function exhibits inverse symmetry about its point of inflection, as established through calculus. The function is defined as f(x) = ax³ + bx² + cx + d, with the inflection point determined by setting the second derivative f''(x) = 0, leading to x = -b/(3a). The proof involves evaluating the function at a shifted point relative to the inflection point, demonstrating that f(x - b/(3a)) = -f(-x - b/(3a). This confirms that cubic functions are odd about their inflection points when b ≠ 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cubic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and inflection points
  • Familiarity with the concept of symmetry in functions
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cubic functions in detail
  • Learn about the implications of inflection points in higher-order polynomials
  • Explore the concept of function symmetry and its applications
  • Investigate the relationship between derivatives and function behavior
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, educators, and anyone interested in the properties of cubic functions and their graphical behavior.

Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
As we know, a quadratic function can be expressed in a form of complete square by a method of completing the square. This form enables us to prove that a quadratic equation is symmetric about its stationary point.
But for the cubic function, is there a similar way to prove that the cubic curve is inversely symmetric about its point of inflection?? (meaning to prove that the curve on each side of the inflection point is inverted but perfectly matched )


Thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually, it turns out that it does! I didn't know this before today.

Since you mentioned the inflexion point, I'm guessing you know calculus. So the proof goes a little something like this:

f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d

f'(x)=3ax^2+2bx+c

f''(x)=6ax+2b

Now obviously to find where the inflexion point is, we let the second derivative equal to 0, so we get

6ax+2b=0

x=\frac{-b}{3a}

Now, the most important point in this proof is the part that comes next. We know that functions are odd or even based on some simple properties f(-x)=-f(x) and f(x)=f(-x) respectively, but this only applies to functions that are odd or even about the y-axis.

What we're trying to prove is if all cubics are odd about their inflexion point (most of the time their inflexion point is not on the y-axis, so whenever b\neq 0).

Before we try to figure out what we're supposed to be evaluating, let's take a simpler example:

g(x)=x^2-2x+1=(x-1)^2
How can we prove that g(x) is an even function about its turning point? Well, if we evaluated g(x+1), we will get g(x+1)=x^2 which is an even function as we know, but how do we show that?

That is, we can't just slap the even property of f(x)=f(-x) onto g, because then we'd be trying to solve g(x+1)=g(-(x+1)) and g(-x-1) is not equal to g(x+1). So what is? Well, if it turns out that we need to solve g(x+1)=g(-x+1).
You should try figure out why this is for yourself.

Ok, so applying what we've discovered to the cubic, it turns out that we want to see if

f\left(x-\frac{b}{3a}\right)=-f\left(-x-\frac{b}{3a}\right)

which if true, satisfies the proof that all cubics are symmetric about their inflexion point.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much. U r inspiring .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
650