Is the Derivation of the Relationship Between CDF and PDF Correct?

  • Thread starter RRraskolnikov
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Derivation
In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between CDF, PDF, and the expected value of a random variable. It is known that the CDF of a random variable z is equal to the probability of z being less than a given value. Similarly, the CDF of a function of z, f(z), is equal to the probability of f(z) being less than a given value. This leads to the conclusion that the PDF of z is equal to the PDF of f(z) multiplied by the derivative of f(z). Additionally, it is noted that the expected value of f(z) can be calculated using either the PDF of z or the PDF of f(z), as shown in equations (1) and (2). Finally, it is
  • #1
RRraskolnikov
12
0
No, this is not for a homework. Please don't delete the thread.

[itex]CDF(Z) = Prob(Z < z)[/itex]
[itex]CDF(Y) = Prob(Y < y)[/itex] where y = f(z)
[itex]PDF(Z) = \frac{d(CDF(Z))}{dz}[/itex]
[itex]PDF(Y) = \frac{d(CDF(Y))}{df(z)}[/itex]

Now, it is known from various internet sources and wikipedia that:
[itex]E(f(z))= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(z) PDF(z) }dz [/itex] - (1)

Also, since z is a random variable, f(z) is also a random variable, hence:
[itex]E(f(z))= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(z) PDF(f(z)) }df(z) [/itex] - (2)

From (1) and (2),
[itex]PDF(z)dz = PDF(f(z)) df(z)[/itex]

From this doesn't it follow that:

[itex] CDF(z) = CDF(f(z)) + const.[/itex]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
OK - check by seeing if you can find some function f(z) where the CDF of f(z) differs from CDF of z by something other than a constant.
 

Related to Is the Derivation of the Relationship Between CDF and PDF Correct?

1. Is this derivation based on solid evidence?

The validity of a derivation depends on the evidence and data used to support it. A correct derivation should be backed up by reliable and well-documented evidence.

2. Are there alternative explanations for the results of the derivation?

It is important to consider alternative explanations for a derivation, as it helps to ensure that the results are not biased or influenced by other factors. A thorough analysis of potential alternative explanations can strengthen the validity of a derivation.

3. Have all assumptions and limitations been considered in the derivation?

A good derivation should take into account any potential assumptions or limitations that may affect the results. It is important to acknowledge and address these factors to ensure the accuracy and validity of the derivation.

4. Are the methods and techniques used in the derivation appropriate?

The methods and techniques used in a derivation should be appropriate for the data and research question being addressed. It is important to use methods that are widely accepted and have been proven to be effective in similar studies.

5. Has the derivation been peer-reviewed?

Peer-review is a crucial step in the scientific process, as it involves other experts in the field reviewing and providing feedback on the derivation. This ensures that the derivation is rigorous and meets the standards of the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Computing and Technology
Replies
9
Views
543
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
821
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
763
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
968
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
601
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top