Is the Discrete Fourier Transform a Unitary Transformation?

Emperor42
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove that the discrete form of the Fourier transform is a unitary transformation

So I used the equation for the discrete Fourier transform:
##y_k=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum^{N-1}_{j=0}{x_je^{i2\pi\frac{jk}{N}}}##

and I put the Fourier transform into a N-1 by N-1 matrix form:
##U=\begin{pmatrix}
e^0 & e^0 & e^0 & ...\\
e^0 & e^{\frac{i2\pi}{N}} & e^{\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & ...\\
e^0 & e^{\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & e^{\frac{i8\pi}{N}} & ...\\
... & ... & ... & ...\\
\end{pmatrix}##

and then found the complex conjugate:
##U^*=\begin{pmatrix}
e^0 & e^0 & e^0 & ...\\
e^0 & e^{-\frac{i2\pi}{N}} & e^{-\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & ...\\
e^0 & e^{-\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & e^{-\frac{i8\pi}{N}} & ...\\
... & ... & ... & ...\\
\end{pmatrix}##

But if I multiply these matrices together I get nothing which even approaches the identity matrix. Anyone have any ideas? Is there something wrong with the matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You omitted the factor of ##1/\sqrt{N}##. Without it, the matrix won't be unitary. Also, the inverse of a unitary matrix is its adjoint, not the complex conjugate.
 
I understand that I haven't put in the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}##. But why do I need the inverse? I'm trying to calculate whether the matrix is unitary so I need to find the inner product of the matrix and its complex conjugate, wouldn't I?
 
Last edited:
Ok I think I can get the diagonal elements to go to if I add the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}## factor but I still don't understand how the off diagonal elements go to zero.
 
Emperor42 said:
I understand that I haven't put in the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}##. But why do I need the inverse? I'm trying to calculate whether the matrix is unitary so I need to find the inner product of the matrix and its complex conjugate, wouldn't I?
No. Unitary means that the inverse of the matrix is its adjoint. In other words, if you multiply a unitary matrix by its adjoint (not conjugate), you get the identity matrix, which is what you're trying to show.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top