Is the DWAVE 2X Quantum Computer Capable of Real Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter .Scott
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
D-Wave's recent advancements in quantum computing have garnered attention, particularly from NASA and Google's Quantum AI Team, which have reportedly validated the machine's capabilities. While previous iterations of D-Wave's technology faced skepticism regarding their practical applications, the current model shows promise for meaningful computational work. Caution is advised when interpreting claims, such as the assertion of being "100 million times faster," which can be misleading. The focus is on the quantum annealing process integrated into the hardware, which has been independently verified to produce genuine quantum processing results. For software developers, a white paper outlines how to program the D-Wave 2X to tackle the color mapping problem, highlighting the potential need for more connections in qubit circuits than the hardware can accommodate and offering solutions for circuit cloning to overcome this limitation.
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,832
Perhaps every year or so I bring up the DWAVE web page (http://www.dwavesys.com/) to see what they claim to have. In the past, I have been impressed by their ability to sell pointless machines for millions of dollars each.
However, their current claims are interesting - representing a potential for purposeful work and lays down an architecture for continued processor development.
NASA and Google's Quantum AI Team have examined this new machine, with there thumbs up reported by the news media through many outlets over the past few days.

Some caution is needed in reading these articles. Here is an example article: http://9to5google.com/2015/12/08/go...n-that-d-waves-quantum-computer-really-works/. Note, in particular, that the "100 million times faster" assertion is useful - but can be readily misinterpreted. It's like saying that a transistor can perform a billion times faster than a detailed simulation of the transistor.

What's important is that the quantum process called "annealing" has been incorporated into a hardware system with the potential to do real work. And that NASA and Google have independently verified that the results are the actual results of quantum processing.

Of particular interest to software developers is this white paper describing how the DWAVE 2X can be programmed to solve the color mapping problem.
http://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/Map%20Coloring%20WP2.pdf
The algorithm demonstrates how the machine is programmed. It also demonstrates that sometime your algorithm will require more connections to a qubit circuit of single qubit than the hardware provides - and demonstrates a method for cloning these circuits to get past this limitation.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...
Back
Top