Is the electrical charge of atomic particles correlated with mass?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the mass and electrical charge of atomic particles, specifically electrons, protons, and neutrons. Electrons possess a negative charge and lighter mass, while protons have a positive charge and heavier mass. Neutrons, which are neutrally charged, have a mass greater than both protons and electrons. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of atomic and sub-atomic physics to explore the binding mechanisms of protons and neutrons, as well as the interactions between particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and particle physics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic forces
  • Basic knowledge of particle interactions and conservation laws
  • Concepts of energy-mass equivalence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of atomic and sub-atomic physics
  • Research the conservation laws in particle interactions
  • Explore the concept of energy-mass equivalence in detail
  • Investigate the mechanisms of particle decay and transformation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in atomic theory, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of particle interactions and atomic structure.

cooksta
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello world.

I've been studying up on the fundamentals of electronics and have started with an abstract on atomic particles.

My understanding is Electrons have a lighter mass and have a negative charge, Protons have a heavier mass and have a positive charge. Neutrons have a mass greater than both and is neutrally charged.

My question then is does the mass of each particle have an effect on the charge of the particles? Lighter particles holding a negative charge and heavier particles holding a positive charge?

Im conceptualising it as almost a kind of a band of electromagnetic force (? some kind of force), where the electrical charge is defined within the band by the mass of the particle.

Also how exactly are Neutrons and Protons bound? I understand the concept of orbiting electrons because of a lighter mass, but why doesn't the Proton and Electron bond?

Despite the fact that they may have different masses they have opposite charges which would attract them.

Wouldn't it make more sense for say, a theoretical Proton/Electron bonded nucleus to have orbiting neutrons? That the only force (Gravity?) dictating the Neutron to orbit would be the mass of the object, which is what we see in solar systems and celestial bodies.

I get the feeling this answer is going to involve a ton of theory on sub-atomic physics, so go easy on me! I did calculus and physics in high school almost a decade ago!

I know these questions seem basic and abstract, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey cooksta and welcome to the forums.

You might want to look at the connection between energy and mass and study the interaction mechanisms between collisions, decay mechanisms, and other similar scenarios (like other interactions).

When you consider how the interaction takes place, what things are conserved, and what properties of the physical decomposition (and re-composition) take place (i.e. a decay, transition to new particle, decomposition into different particles, etc) then you will have a much better idea to try and answer your question.

I can't give you a straight answer to your question, but you will need to study a lot of atomic and sub-atomic physics to get real specific answers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
914
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K