Is the Energy Released in LHC Collisions Sufficient for Particle Generation?

Thread starter ber70
Start date Nov 15, 2010
Tags

Collisions Energy Large hadron collider Lhc

AI Thread Summary

The energy released in Large Hadron Collider (LHC) collisions is currently being utilized to generate other particles. However, the energy produced in these collisions is insufficient for the creation of new particles. Therefore, while LHC collisions do facilitate particle generation, they do not provide enough energy to produce additional particles beyond what is currently generated. This limitation highlights the challenges in particle physics research. Overall, the energy dynamics in LHC collisions are critical for understanding particle generation.

Nov 15, 2010

ber70

Can we use energy in LHC collisions?

Physics news on Phys.org

Nov 15, 2010

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Insights Author

ber70 said:

Can we use energy in LHC collisions?

Aren't we already? We're using it to generate other particles!

Zz.

Nov 15, 2010

LURCH

Science Advisor

The enrgy released in LHC collisions is less than the energy required to generate them. So, if I understand your question correctly, the answer is no.

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

View full post »