Is the equation 4x^(2) + 5y^(2) = 2 solvable with rational roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saadsarfraz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
saadsarfraz
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Show that the equation 4x^(2) + 5y^(2) = 2 has no rational solutions.

Can this be done graphically?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you have a rigorous graphical method, then of course. Though, I'm hard pressed to think of any that would be applicable...
 
Suppose the equation has rational roots:
4x^(2) + 5y^(2) = 2
x=p1/q1
y=p2/q2
gcd(p1,q1)=gcd(p2,q2)=1
4(p1^2/q1^2)+5(p2/q2)^2=2
[4(p1q2)^2+5(p2q1)^2]/(q2q1)^2=2
4(p1q2)^2+5(p2q1)^2=2(q2q1)^2
then the question becomes does the equation:
4a+5b=2c
where a,b,c are natural numbers has solution.
4(a+b)+b=2c
because 2c is even b must be even also, but then b=(4a-2c)/5 then 4a-2c is divisble by 5, i.e 4a-2c=0 or a and c are multiples of 5.
if b=0 then c=2a i.e (q2q1)^2=2(p1q2)^2 but this isn't possible cause sqrt(2) is irrational.
Now you need to check the option of multiples of 5 and get a contradiction, perhaps someone else with more intel in number theory will chip in with this question.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top