Is the first 3 minutes the best pop sci book ever written

  • Thread starter Thread starter g.lemaitre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evaluation of popular science (pop sci) books, emphasizing that the significance of the content is more critical than the assumed knowledge level of the reader. The conversation highlights that understanding the origins of the universe is a paramount question for laypeople, with Steven Weinberg's contributions in the 1970s being particularly noteworthy for making complex scientific ideas accessible. Weinberg is praised for writing what is considered one of the best pop sci books due to his ability to synthesize information for readers with a basic understanding of science. In contrast, while Einstein's writings on relativity are acknowledged as significant, they are viewed as less impactful than discussions about the universe's origins. Additionally, the discussion mentions that alternative resources, such as Barnett's "The Universe and Dr. Einstein," may provide clearer insights than Einstein's own works. The role of videos in enhancing understanding of scientific concepts, particularly special relativity, is also recognized.
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
We don't judge pop sci books based on what level of science they assume the reader has. There are myriad levels of understanding science. Every author must choose which level they feel comfortable condescending too. We do judge pop sci books based on the significance of what they are teaching. To me nothing is more significant to the layman than the answer to the question where we come from. Before the 70s we often thought that question was completely beyond science. Weinberg showed in the 70s that finally we actually could have some very precise info about where we come from. He explained that idea to the layman albeit to a layman who had done some very hard work in understanding science, nevertheless he put all the info together for a student of science to understand. For me, therefore, Weinberg deserves the laurels of having written the best pop sci book ever.

Let's take another candidate for best pop sci book. Einstein wrote pop sci books. I know because I read them, albeit 12 years ago. Einstein told us that time and length were not exactly fixed. That's significant and pretty wild but it is not as significant as knowing the origin of the universe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
g.lemaitre said:
Let's take another candidate for best pop sci book. Einstein wrote pop sci books. I know because I read them, albeit 12 years ago. Einstein told us that time and length were not exactly fixed. That's significant and pretty wild but it is not as significant as knowing the origin of the universe.

I didn't get much out of Einstein's little pop book on relativity. There's another little book about the same size and length by Barnett called "The Universe and Dr. Einstein" that I thought was much better. Einstein liked it too as he wrote the preface to it.
 
DiracPool said:
I didn't get much out of Einstein's little pop book on relativity. There's another little book about the same size and length by Barnett called "The Universe and Dr. Einstein" that I thought was much better. Einstein liked it too as he wrote the preface to it.

Well, videos are also real helpful for understanding SR
 
Every day we learn new things. Sometimes it's just a small fact or realization. No matter how trivial or random, let's start recording our daily lessons. Please start off with "Today I learned". Keep commentary to a minimum and just LIKE posts. I'll start! Today I learned that you clean up a white hat by spraying some cleaner with bleach on it (rinse before putting it back on your head!)
Back
Top