Is the first question worked right and any hints on the second please

  • Thread starter Thread starter electricsound
  • Start date Start date
electricsound
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. The rotating blade of a hovering helicopter sweeps out an area of radius 4m imparting a downward velocity of 12ms^-1 to the air displaced. Find the mass of the helicopter.
(g=10ms^-2, density of air= 1.3 kgm^-3)

The Attempt at a Solution


F=d/dt(mv)
F= (density of air*volume)*12
= 1.3*pie*16*12*12
=9409N
mass of helicopter= 940kg (the answers matched, but is it worked correct?)

2. The speed of rotation of the blades of the helicopter in question 1 is increased so that the air now hasa downward velocity of 13ms^-1. Find the upward acceleration of the helicopter.
attempt at the solution
F=mv
11043N=1.3(pie*16*13*13
F=ma
11043N=940*a

11043/940=a

Actual answer= 1.7ms^-2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first part looks right, but in the second part remember that the 12 m/s air velocity just held the helicopter stationary. So to calculate the acceleration, you need to calculate the difference between the force that held the helicopter stationary (12 m/s air) and the increased air velocity (13 m/s air.). You calculated the entire force from the 13 m/s air and forgot to subtract off that part of the force which is compensating gravity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top