Is the Flash Scale of the Universe Animation Still Relevant?

AI Thread Summary
The Flash Scale of the Universe animation is recognized for its beauty and effectiveness as a teaching tool. It features a slider that allows users to control the scale, enhancing the interactive experience. The animation highlights the uncertainty in lengths shorter than 10-16 meters, where concepts like strings and quantum foam are still speculative. Despite being an older resource, its relevance continues as evidenced by multiple discussions about it. The ongoing interest underscores its value in educational contexts.
Astronomy news on Phys.org


It's beautiful and could be a great teaching tool.

As it says around 10-16 meters, "lengths shorter than this are not confirmed"
so there is a bit of terra incognita where be strings and quantum foam speculated.

It's very nice to have control of the the scale by dragging the slider and also that you can give it a shove and it will coast for a ways.

I had not seen it.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
103
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top