B Is the following fact significant? (the factorisation of A^3 +/- B^3)

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Terry Coates
  • Start date Start date
Terry Coates
Messages
39
Reaction score
2
In the factorisation of A^3 +/- B^3 = (A+/B)(A^2-/+A.B + B^2) the larger factor is the solution for finding the third side of a triangle with sides A and B with the angle between them of 60/120 degrees.(Cosine rule) For any set of three different numbers X>Y>Z there would be three different triangles with the length of the third side being (Y^3 + Z^3)^0.5 (60 deg), (X^3 - Y^3)^0.5 (120 deg) and (X^3 - Z^3)^0.5 (120 deg) Might be of interest in the proof of FLT for power 3.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
By FLT, I presume you mean Fermat's Last Theorem. I will need to study your post further. Perhaps others might have an input.
 
Terry Coates said:
In the factorisation of A^3 +/- B^3 = (A+/B)(A^2-/+A.B + B^2)
Presumably you intended the first factor on the right to be (A +/- B). You can also write this more clearly as (A ± B), using the symbols under the ##\Sigma## icon on the menu bar.

Terry Coates said:
the larger factor is the solution for finding the third side of a triangle with sides A and B with the angle between them of 60/120 degrees.(Cosine rule)
"angle between them of 60 degrees or 120 degrees"

Terry Coates said:
For any set of three different numbers X>Y>Z there would be three different triangles with the length of the third side being (Y^3 + Z^3)^0.5 (60 deg), (X^3 - Y^3)^0.5 (120 deg) and (X^3 - Z^3)^0.5 (120 deg)
How so? If the two sides used in the Cosine Rule are A and B, and the included angle is either 60° or 120° (with cosines of 1/2 and -1/2, respectively), the length of the third side is ##C = \sqrt{A^2 \pm AB + B^2}##.

What you apparently are saying is that ##C = \sqrt{A^3 \pm B^3}##, which isn't true, since the right side is ##\sqrt{(A \pm B)(A^2 \pm AB + B^2)}## and you have omitted the ##(A \pm B)## factor in your work with the Cosine Rule above.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top