Is the given Pauli matrix in SU(2)?

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Can I check with someone - is the following pauli matrix in SU(2):

0 -i
i 0

Matrices in SU(2) take this form, I think:

a b
-b* a*

(where * represents complex conjugation)

It seems to me that the matrix at the top isn't in SU(2) - if b=-i, (-b*) should be -i...

However, my notes say otherwise (that all pauli matrices are in SU(2)).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pauli matrices are not actually unitary matrices and thus are not actually themselves elements of SU(2). They are the traceless and Hermitian 'generators' of infinitesimal SU(2) transformations. I.e., an arbitrary SU(2) matrix is given by exponentiation of a linear combination of Pauli matrices.

This is if my memory serves me correctly. I'm sure someone will correct me if not.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top