Is the Graviton Too Elusive for Particle Physicists to Find at the LHC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joeyb9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton
joeyb9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is there seemingly so little interest among particle physicists about discovering the graviton? Is it because it is believed to be too difficult, even hopeless, to find, or some other reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think its because the graviton comes from the General Relativity world and theories trying to bridge between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity are still too tenuous that it isn't seriously looked for.

Also, once gravity waves are found then they will dig deeper.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

but I'm sure if they ever do find a spin-2 massless particle there will be a lot of excitement in the Physics world...
 
joeyb9 said:
Why is there seemingly so little interest among particle physicists about discovering the graviton? Is it because it is believed to be too difficult, even hopeless, to find, or some other reason?

Detecting gravitons experimentally is hopelessly infeasible, because they pass through everything with very high probability. This is similar to the problem of detecting neutrinos, but many many orders of magnitude worse. See e.g. http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0601043v3.pdf
 
The graviton Lagrangian is very roughly
L = \frac{1}{2G_N} |\nabla h|^2 - h \cdot T
for Newtonian gravitational constant GN, metric perturbation h, and energy-momentum tensor T. Going over to quantum-mechanical units,
G_N = \frac{1}{m_{Pl}{}^2}
where mPl is the Planck mass.

Let's rescale h by multiplying it by the Planck mass:
h = \frac{1}{m_{Pl}}{\tilde h}
That makes the Lagrangian
L = \frac12 |\nabla {\tilde h}|^2 - \frac{1}{m_{Pl}}{\tilde h} \cdot T

That makes interaction matrix elements proportional to the reciprocal of the Planck mass, and total process rates proportional to the reciprocal of the square of it. So,
\text{(process rate)} \sim \text{("normal" process rate)} \left( \frac{E}{m_{Pl}} \right)^2

At the LHC's energies of about 1 TeV/parton, that's about 10-32. Thus, it will be VERY difficult to see evidence of individual gravitons at the LHC, as opposed to macroscopic, classical-limit gravity.
 
The "normal" graviton will be impossible to find with the LHC, but some models (in particular, models with extra dimensions) predict massive graviton-like particles that could be detectable.
CERN made a webpage for it, and searching for "graviton LHC" gives several publications about it.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top