Is the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian an unbounded operator?

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
My answer would be "yes," and here's my argument: If we let
<br /> H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac 12 m \omega^2 x^2,<br />
it is a Hermitian operator with familiar normalized eigenfunctions \phi_n(x) (these are products of Hermite polynomials and gaussians) and associated eigenvalues E_n = \hbar \omega(n + 1/2), n = 0,1,2,\ldots. I claim H is unbounded because, in order to be bounded, there would need to be a constant c\in \mathbb R such that \| H \psi \| \leq c \|\psi\| for all \psi \in L^2(-\infty,\infty), the Hilbert space of square integrable functions (i.e., the norm in question is the L^2 norm). No such c exists, however; if we focus only on the eigenfunctions, we have
<br /> H \phi_n(x) = \hbar \omega (n + 1/2) \phi_n,<br /> [/itex]<br /> so <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \| H \phi_n(x) \| = \hbar \omega (n + 1/2) \| \phi_n(x) \| = \hbar \omega (n + 1/2),&lt;br /&gt;<br /> which can be made larger than any constant we care to pick by taking n large enough. Hence H is an unbounded operator.<br /> <br /> ...is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamiltonian is only bounded from below.
 
xepma said:
The Hamiltonian is only bounded from below.
What does "bounded from below" mean, rigorously?
 
AxiomOfChoice said:
What does "bounded from below" mean, rigorously?

May be it means: the spectrum is bounded from below(left) subset of the reals?
 
AxiomOfChoice said:
What does "bounded from below" mean, rigorously?

Maybe this:
AxiomOfChoice said:
...in order to be bounded from below, there would need to be a constant c\in \mathbb R such that \| H \psi \| \geq c \|\psi\| for all \psi \in L^2(-\infty,\infty), the Hilbert space of square integrable functions (i.e., the norm in question is the L^2 norm).
?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top