tybeedave
- 6
- 0
if not, what is it?
So you are saying that the spacetime foam isn't even related to the highs field?...I'm not trying to yank your chain...I thought they both were based on an all everywhere type of thing.mfb said:Is an apple the same as blue?
The question does not make sense.
tybeedave said:So you are saying that the spacetime foam isn't even related to the highs field?...I'm not trying to yank your chain...I thought they both were based on an all everywhere type of thing.
According to the Standard Model, those are the elementary particles we know - electrons, quarks, gluons, Higgs and so on. On the other hand, the fields look more fundamental than the particles.tybeedave said:I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe
No.tybeedave said:It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.
tybeedave said:I see what your saying, and, I'm not illogical. I'm trying to determine the character of and to understand quantum energy...by that, I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe, what I referred to in my question as spacetime foam. It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.
ZapperZ said:Spacetime foam is NOT a "quantum of energy". I don't believe you understand the physics involved in any of this. Is this correct?
You can't simply try to formulate an idea when you do not have a good understanding of the various components that make up that idea. This is not only illogical, it is also irrational.
And has been stated, per the PF Rules that you had agreed to, personal theory such as this is forbidden. You're welcome to try and learn what the Higgs field is, what "spacetime foam" is, etc.. etc. But if you try to attempt at selling your own theory, you might have a very rough time on this forum.
Zz.