Is the higgs field the same as spacetime foam?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the relationship between the Higgs field and spacetime foam, with participants asserting that they are not the same. Clarification is sought on the concept of spacetime foam, which is described as speculative and not necessarily relevant to our universe. The Higgs field is established as a fundamental field within spacetime, distinct from the concept of spacetime foam. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding existing theories before proposing new ideas, highlighting that personal theories are not welcome in the forum. Ultimately, spacetime foam is not considered a quantum of energy, and a solid grasp of physics is necessary for meaningful discussion.
tybeedave
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
if not, what is it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Is an apple the same as blue?
The question does not make sense.
 
mfb said:
Is an apple the same as blue?
The question does not make sense.
So you are saying that the spacetime foam isn't even related to the highs field?...I'm not trying to yank your chain...I thought they both were based on an all everywhere type of thing.
 
First you have to clarify what "the spacetime foam" is supposed to mean. There are some speculative theories that predict that spacetime is not continuous. It is unclear if those theories have any relevance to our universe at all. There are established theories that predict other effects at small scales that might be called "spacetime foam", without completely breaking spacetime. All this has no special relation to the Higgs field. Sure, the Higgs field is in spacetime. So is the electromagnetic field. And the other fields of the constituents of an apple. All those fields exist everywhere.
 
tybeedave said:
So you are saying that the spacetime foam isn't even related to the highs field?...I'm not trying to yank your chain...I thought they both were based on an all everywhere type of thing.

I'm questioning your logic here. Even if they are both the "all everywhere type of thing", why would that characteristics alone imply that they are the same thing? That's like saying since a cow and an apple are both edible, they are the same thing.

Zz.
 
I see what your saying, and, I'm not illogical. I'm trying to determine the character of and to understand quantum energy...by that, I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe, what I referred to in my question as spacetime foam. It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.
 
Also, since energy and mass are equivalent, all particles are would seem to be related, even cows and apples...
 
Actually, you are being somewhat illogical. You are trying to develop your own theories (which, BTW, is not what PF is for) before understanding what has come before. Is that logical?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb
tybeedave said:
I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe
According to the Standard Model, those are the elementary particles we know - electrons, quarks, gluons, Higgs and so on. On the other hand, the fields look more fundamental than the particles.
tybeedave said:
It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.
No.
 
  • #10
I'm not sure if I understand your question right. You say that the higgsfield itself is the quantum foam in Spacetime of the superscalarfield?

If this is your question, then NO.
 
  • #11
tybeedave said:
I see what your saying, and, I'm not illogical. I'm trying to determine the character of and to understand quantum energy...by that, I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe, what I referred to in my question as spacetime foam. It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.

Spacetime foam is NOT a "quantum of energy". I don't believe you understand the physics involved in any of this. Is this correct?

You can't simply try to formulate an idea when you do not have a good understanding of the various components that make up that idea. This is not only illogical, it is also irrational.

And has been stated, per the PF Rules that you had agreed to, personal theory such as this is forbidden. You're welcome to try and learn what the Higgs field is, what "spacetime foam" is, etc.. etc. But if you try to attempt at selling your own theory, you might have a very rough time on this forum.

Zz.
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
Spacetime foam is NOT a "quantum of energy". I don't believe you understand the physics involved in any of this. Is this correct?

You can't simply try to formulate an idea when you do not have a good understanding of the various components that make up that idea. This is not only illogical, it is also irrational.

And has been stated, per the PF Rules that you had agreed to, personal theory such as this is forbidden. You're welcome to try and learn what the Higgs field is, what "spacetime foam" is, etc.. etc. But if you try to attempt at selling your own theory, you might have a very rough time on this forum.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top