I Is the identity of a group unique?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lebnm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Group
Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
In general, the textbooks says that, if the set ##G## is a group, so to every element ##g \in G## there is other element ##g^{-1} \in G## such that ##g g^{-1} = g^{-1}g = e##, where ##e## is the identity of the group. But I am reading a book where this propriete is write only as ##g^{-1} g = e##, and the book says that ##g g^{-1} = e## follows from this. The proof it gives is: Applaying ##g## on the left on the both sides, we have $$g(g^{-1} g) = (g g^{-1}) g = g e = g,$$and of this the book concludes that ##g g^{-1}## is equal to ##e##, because its action in ##g## gives ##g##.
Is it correct? To me, it was necessary to proof also that ##g(g g^{-1}) = g##, because with this I could use the fact that the identity of a group is unique.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be exact, one first proves that left and right identity are the same: ##e_lg=ge_r=g \Longrightarrow e_l=e_r## and that there cannot be two identities, i.e. we have to show ##e=e'##. Then you can conclude that the right inverse is equal to the left inverse. (You wrote ##eg=ge## which you cannot know from the start, then you concluded ##gg^{-1}=e## which is also not known until the uniqueness of ##e## has been proven.)

Another way to define a group is by demanding that the equations ##ax=b## and ##xa=b## can uniquely be solved (IIRC).
 
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235
A nice exercise in this area is to show that the identity of a subgroup must be the same as that of the supergroup. And that a subset S is a group iff for all a,b in S, ##ab^{-1}## is also in S.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
430
Replies
13
Views
564
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
348
Back
Top