Is the inernal energy of the universe decreasing?

In summary, the total energy of the universe is not well defined and can only be approximately calculated through an integral of energy density and volume. This quantity, known as PQ, is not conserved in universes with pressure, such as our current matter-dominated universe. However, it is conserved in dust universes and was not conserved during the radiation-dominated era of the universe. It should not be considered as the true energy of the universe.
  • #1
alias25
197
0
cause the universe is expanding so it s doing work is increasing and the total Q energy in the universe is constant so Q(constant) = U + W(increasing)
so U is decreasing?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
The total energy of the universe isn't really well defined.

One can define an intergal of energy density * volume

PQ= (energy density) * (volume-in-cosmological-coordinates).

However, this intergal, which I call PQ for no particularly good reason except to give it a name, is not really the "energy" of the universe. It is not the energy because it depends on one's choice of coordinates, and because it's not necessarily conserved. But it's an interesting quantity, nonetheless.

For standard isotropic cosmologies (FRW cosmologies), PQ is conserved exactly in "dust" universes, and is not exactly conserved in any universe where there is pressure. Our universe is matter dominated at the current time, so the pressure is very low, but it is non-zero, thus PQ is not exactly conserved in our universe, but is approximately conserved. (This assumes that one belives our universe is modeled by a FRW cosmology).

Note that in the past, the universe was radiation dominated rather than matter dominated, making the pressure high, and that in this era of the universe PQ was not even approximately conserved.

This is discussed a bit in MTW, where the above quantity is calculated in more detail, and it is stressed that this quantity should *NOT* be considered to be the "energy of the universe" (even thought it is tempting to do so).
 

1. Is the internal energy of the universe really decreasing?

The answer to this question is not definitive. Some scientists believe that the internal energy of the universe is indeed decreasing, while others argue that it is constantly changing and cannot be measured accurately. More research is needed to fully understand this concept.

2. How is the internal energy of the universe measured?

Scientists use various methods to measure the internal energy of the universe, such as examining the expansion rate of the universe, analyzing the cosmic microwave background radiation, and studying the distribution of matter and dark energy in the universe.

3. What is causing the decrease in internal energy of the universe?

The decrease in internal energy of the universe is believed to be caused by the expansion of the universe. As the universe expands, the energy within it becomes more spread out, leading to a decrease in the overall internal energy.

4. Will the decrease in internal energy of the universe continue indefinitely?

It is currently unknown if the decrease in internal energy of the universe will continue indefinitely. Some theories suggest that the expansion of the universe will eventually slow down and possibly reverse, leading to an increase in internal energy. However, more research is needed to fully understand the fate of the universe.

5. How does the decrease in internal energy of the universe affect us?

The decrease in internal energy of the universe does not have a direct impact on our daily lives. However, it does play a significant role in shaping the structure and evolution of the universe. It also has implications for the ultimate fate of the universe and our place within it.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
698
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
503
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
858
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
983
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
693
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top