Is the Kronecker delta linear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter entropy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Linear
entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
I don't see how the kronecker delta function is linear, and hence I don't see how it can serve as a dual basis for a ket space.

How is the kronecker delta linear? How can it serve as a dual basis?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are different meanings of "linear" depending on the context. It seems you are mixing them up, as well as Dirac and Kronecker. The functions spanning a function space don't have to be linear, but the space is a linear space, because it consists of linear superpositions of those functions.

In case of the Dirac delta you don't even have a function however. But the associated functional that extracts a single value from a test function is linear.

Look up these concepts, maybe that will clear up your confusion.
 
I think I understand now. Thanks. I mistook the Kronecker delta for being defined 0 for any vector which was not a particular basevector, but in fact it is only defined such for certain basevectors. And the Kronecker delta is not a function. The functionals with the Kronecker delta property are. :wink:
 
Last edited:
New question:
What is the significance of a basis functional with respect to physical reality? :smile:
 
Last edited:
entropy1 said:
What is the significance of a basis functional with respect to physical reality? :smile:

I presume you mean basis vectors.

I think 'physical reality' is far too vague and undefined a concept to be of any value here.

Its value lies in the Born rule. If you expand the state |u> in terms of an observables O = Σyi |bi><bi| eigenvectors, |u> = Σ ci |bi>, the coefficients of that expansion, ci, give the probability of outcome i by |ci|^2.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
bhobba said:
I presume you mean basis vectors.
Nope, I ment basis functionals. But I guess I have to learn further to what eigenvectors are first. :wink:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top