Is the matter of black holes in our universe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence and implications of matter within black holes, questioning whether this matter remains part of our universe despite being trapped in a singularity. It highlights that black holes exert gravitational effects, suggesting that their matter is still causally connected to our universe, even if it occupies no spatial extension. Theoretical ideas propose that black holes could harbor "baby universes" or even lead to the emergence of multiple parallel universes through quantum processes. Additionally, a hypothesis is presented regarding the dominance of matter over antimatter in the universe, potentially linked to the behavior of virtual particles in the presence of massive objects. Ultimately, the conversation explores the complex relationship between black holes and the fabric of our universe.
Gerinski
Where is the matter of black holes?
It seems the matter which ever formed or fell into a black hole, is somehow still in our universe, since it still exerts a gravitational effect to the remaining matter in our universe.
However, it is often said that the singularity at the center of black holes, where all that matter fell into, is an edge of our universe, spacetime becoming meaningless or non-existing.
As far as we can tell, for matter to be some spatial extension is needed, matter particles take some space. It also appears that according to astronomers, black holes exist with thousands of millions of times the mass of our sun.

Where is that matter?
Can we say it is occupying some space in our universe?
If we say it takes no space at all, where is it? it still shows up in our universe through its gravitation
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Lee Smolin has speculated that the inhabitants of a "universe" inside a black hole might look back at a singularity, much as we look back at the proposed big bang. In this model, perhaps we might consider the contents of a black hole to be in our universe, but outside our observable universe.

I have speculated that massive objects can locally align the virtual particle pairs of the ZPE EM field such that any black hole (in our universe) will absorb more antiparticles than particles. This would provide a handy mechanism by which antiparticles are preferentially removed from the virtual pairs and more particles than antiparticles are promoted to real status. This would explain why matter inexplicably dominates our observable universe (when matter and antimatter should have been produced in equal proportions in a "big bang"). Our universe may have coalesced concurrently with infinite others (some dominated by matter, some by anitmatter) by just this mechanism. Indeed, it's turtles all the way down in this view.
 
Last edited:
Since, as you noted, the gravitational effect has observable consequences in this universe, it follows that the matter responsible for it is still causally connected to this universe. Of course, it is also causally connected to whatever internal structure [eg, baby universe] it may possess.
 
of late I have been kicking around kind of a weird idea that instead of a baby universe directly pinching off from a black hole- that instead a new universe [or bundle of universes] "virtually" emerge as a result of the natural quantum computation of the event horizon which chaotically computes cosmically complex wavefunctions to the limit of Bekenstein's bound and thus generates [or "projects"?] an ensemble of parallel quantum universes-
essentially a universe then would be a natural "virtual simulation" within a simulation within a simulation... ad infinitum-

hope that isn't too crankish- is it?
 
Last edited:
So, we have no way but to accept that we are causally influenced by "nowhere" ? :-)
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Back
Top