Is the new Bionic Woman living up to the hype?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EnumaElish
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around NBC's "Bionic Woman," with participants expressing their opinions on the show and comparing it to the original "Bionic Woman" and "Six Million Dollar Man." Some viewers find the new series likable based on its IMDB ratings, while others reflect on the quality of writing, noting it seems better than past shows. There is a debate about the appropriateness of comparing the new series to the original "Bionic Woman" rather than "Six Million Dollar Man." Participants also touch on the portrayal of the lead actress, Michelle Ryan, and her background. Concerns are raised about the scientific realism of the show's premise, particularly regarding the integration of machinery with human anatomy, though viewers acknowledge the need to suspend disbelief for the sake of enjoyment. The conversation also briefly mentions other shows like "Reaper," "Journeyman," and "Heroes," indicating a broader interest in current sci-fi programming.
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
124
Has anyone been following NBC's Bionic Woman? Do you like it so far? How would you compare to the "Golden Oldies" Bionic Woman or Six Million Dollar Man?

On a related topic: how's she for a "robot" wife?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
EnumaElish said:
Has anyone been following NBC's Bionic Woman? Do you like it so far? How would you compare to the "Golden Oldies" Six Million Dollar Man?
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to compare it to the old "Bionic Woman" show?
 
Evo said:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to compare it to the old "Bionic Woman" show?
It wasn't "on" at my spacetime coordinates.

But, I've looked at the IMDB page just now, and it looks likeable.

Will edit OP in light of it.
 
I haven't watched it. Can I say I really like "Reaper" the comedy remake of "Brimstone"? Usually I hate remakes, but Reaper as a comedy is so different from the original that it really works. I'd say it's better than "Pushing up daisies".
 
I hadn't realized that the "remade" bionic woman was of the EastEnders "fame." (Nor, that she is British.)
 
Does she still have a mockney accent and mulch around with a permanent scowl on her face? :biggrin:
 
No making fun of Lindsay Wagner. She was my babe back in the day.
 
I mean Michelle 'Zoe Slater' Ryan :smile:
 
You can watch full episodes on nbc.com. Also check out journeyman and heroes. (both sci-fi, full episodes on-line)

70's writing, IMO, was lame even in the 70's. Writers were under pressure from execs with IQs less than 46, and whom had never read a sci-fi short story or novel in their lives (because they didn't know how to read--they only knew how to talk loudly in restaurants)

I've only watched three episodes and thought the writing was fairly good. Let's hope the execs stay out of the writer's office. Looking at a middle aged Michael Ferrar is like watching his dad (Jose') 30 years ago--uncanny resemblance. I think Michael's a better actor than his dad--or maybe he listens to the director.

As far as the physics goes... no. You can't put new wine in old wine skins without a mess, and you can't mount pneumatic machinery on a human skeleton without a mess. Also the brain interface stuff is a crock. But I know to suspend my scientific knowledge when watching a sci fi, so that I can enjoy it.
 
  • #10
fleem said:
you can't mount pneumatic machinery on a human skeleton without a mess. Also the brain interface stuff is a crock. But I know to suspend my scientific knowledge when watching a sci fi, so that I can enjoy it.
What about electric servomotors? Hasn't there been a lot of advancement in artificial limbs?
 
  • #11
EnumaElish said:
What about electric servomotors? Hasn't there been a lot of advancement in artificial limbs?

I should say you can't mount powerful stuff and then use it--it'd break the rest of her skeleton.
 
Back
Top