Is the Norm of Four-Acceleration Always Equal to Proper Frame Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnahn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
johnahn
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I saw that the norm of four acceleration is equal to the magnitude of proper frame's acceleration.

So, if the observer moves in x direction, following equation about norm of it's 4 acceleration is like that

-(d^2 t / dτ^2) + (d^2 x / dτ^2) = d^2 x / dt^2

In comoving frame(proper frame), proper time is equals to t, so the first term in the left side vanishes, and the remain term is equal to the right side.

I tried to proof this relationship generally... but it's very hard for me.

Now I confused whether the general proof exists, or not...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnahn, Here's the general relationship. It gets messy! If the 4-velocity is v = (γv, γc) so v·v = c2, then the 4-acceleration is

a ≡ dv/dτ = (γ2a + γ4(v·a)v/c2, γ4(v·a)/c) where a is the 3-acceleration, a = dv/dt.

The norm of this is a·a = -γ6a·a + γ6/c2[(v·a)2 - (v·v)(a·a)].

In the special case that v and a are parallel, it reduces to |a| = γ3|a|.
 
johnahn said:
I saw that the norm of four acceleration is equal to the magnitude of proper frame's acceleration.
...
I tried to proof this relationship generally... but it's very hard for me.

Now I confused whether the general proof exists, or not...
The norm of the four-acceleration is invariant. So if you prove it in one frame then you have proved it in all frames.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top