B Is the probability of a quantum outcome ever zero such as with....

CosmicVoyager
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Is the probability of a quantum outcome ever zero such as with the location of an electron around atom or with radioactive decay?
Greetings,

Given an infinite universe or an infinite number of universes?

- Regarding the location of an electron around an atom, is there a tiny volume in which finding the electron 100%? Or is there a possibility, no matter how remote, it might be found a meter away or a kilometer away?

- Regarding radioactive decay, must the half-life rule always occur? Is there any possibility that all the radioactive atoms in a billion atom sample will decay at once?

Are such outcomes prevented by matter, energy, space, and time being quantized? By Planck units? Does that cause probabilities to become zero?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are zero or one probabilities in quantum mechanics.
For example there are transitions in atoms (best example is hydrogen) which can't occur. So called forbidden transitions.
Also electrons are fermions and thus can't occupy the same quantum numbers. I.e. if you have a wave function ##\psi(x_1, x_2)## this will become zero for ##x_1 \to x_2##. And if the wavefunction is zero then the probability (density) ##|\psi(x, x)|^2## is also zero.

Regarding your second question: This is effectively a statistical property. So in theory.. yes. However I reckon the probability of a billion atoms all decaying at the same time is effectively zero. So in theory yes, in practice not really.
 
  • Like
Likes CosmicVoyager, vanhees71 and PeroK
CosmicVoyager said:
- Regarding the location of an electron around an atom, is there a tiny volume in which finding the electron 100%? Or is there a possibility, no matter how remote, it might be found a meter away or a kilometer away?
Basic QM is non relativistic and there is a non-zero probability of a particle being found outside its future light cone. That's one reason that ultimately you need QFT to describe elementary particles.

Moreover, in order to test something you need a realistic probability in order to confirm the theory with experiment. If the probability of something is vanishingly small, then it's experimentally indistinguishable from the impossible.
 
  • Like
Likes CosmicVoyager and DrChinese
EmilD said:
So in theory yes, in practice not really.
PeroK said:
If the probability of something is vanishingly small, then it's experimentally indistinguishable from the impossible.

Thanks for your very helpful replies. So, though the odds of us observing such events is practically zero, in an infinite universe or in an infinite number of universes, these events would occur. And would actually occur an infinite number of times, correct?
 
Last edited:
CosmicVoyager said:
Thanks for your very helpful replies. So, though the odds of us observing such events is practically zero, in an infinite universe or in an infinite number of universes, these events would occur. And would actually occur an infinite number of times, correct?
I'm not sure that's a well-defined question. In QM generally you can only talk about the measurements you do make.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top