Is the Projection of a Triple Integral's Base Always a Rectangle?

1 reply · 4K views · last reply
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the question along with the solution and sketch.
Handwritten sketch of the (x,z)-plane footprint of solid E: a shaded region D bounded by the curve x = 1 - z^2 (z = sqrt(1 - x)), the axes and x = 1, with slab limits 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and z from 0 to sqrt(1 - x).


I think the sketch is wrong because the projection in the xy plane shows a rectangular box. I don't think it is a rectangular box because you can solve for an equation relating x and y.

You know that y = 1-z and x = 1-z^2, so you can solve for some equation with x and y by eliminated z. Which gets you x = -(y-1)^2 + 1 for the relationship in the xy plane and it is clearly not a rectangle...?
 
theBEAST said:

Homework Statement


Here is the question along with the solution and sketch.
Handwritten solution sheet for a triple integral: a 3D sketch of a solid with a curved front x = 1 - z^2 and top plane y + z = 1, plus a footprint diagram in the (x,z)-plane showing region D under z = sqrt(1-x) and x = 1 - z^2, with notes on z limits 0 to sqrt(1-x) for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.


I think the sketch is wrong because the projection in the xy plane shows a rectangular box. I don't think it is a rectangular box because you can solve for an equation relating x and y.

You know that y = 1-z and x = 1-z^2, so you can solve for some equation with x and y by eliminated z. Which gets you x = -(y-1)^2 + 1 for the relationship in the xy plane and it is clearly not a rectangle...?
That last equation is, of course, x= y(2- y) but it is the projection of the boundary of the y= 1- z and x= 1- z^2, NOT the base itself. The sketch is correct.