Is the relationship between water pressure and gravity a direct correlation?

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between water pressure and gravity is direct and linear, meaning that if gravity decreases, the crush depth of a submersible increases proportionally. For example, a submersible with a crush depth of 1000 feet on Earth could withstand a depth of 4000 feet on a planet with one-fourth of Earth's gravity. However, factors like gravitational force variations with distance and the slight compressibility of water can influence this relationship, though they are often negligible in practical scenarios. Water resistance, or drag, is primarily determined by the fluid's density and viscosity, rather than pressure. Overall, while gravity affects water pressure, other factors like surface tension and fluid properties also play significant roles in fluid dynamics.
Lelan Thara
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I hope this is the best sub-forum for this question:

How direct is the relationship between water pressure and the weight of the water, as determined by the local gravity where the water is?

In other words - let's say we have a submersible with a crush depth of 1000 feet on Earth. If we moved that submersible to a watery planet with one fourth of Earth's gravity - would the crush depth become 4000 feet?

To phrase it another way - if I had a body of water large enough to swim in in a microgravity environment - would the water offer any resistance as I swam through it?

Do issues of surface tension, friction, viscosity and so so on play a significant role in determining water pressure? Or is it a simple direct correlation between water pressure and gravity - half the gravity means half the water pressure for equal volumes of water?

Thanks very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lelan Thara said:
How direct is the relationship between water pressure and the weight of the water, as determined by the local gravity where the water is?
Direct, linear.
In other words - let's say we have a submersible with a crush depth of 1000 feet on Earth. If we moved that submersible to a watery planet with one fourth of Earth's gravity - would the crush depth become 4000 feet?
Yep. Since the pressure is simply the weight of the column of water above the submersible, if the water weighs one fourth as much, it can go four times as deep. Two caveats:

1. Gravitational force changes with distance from the center of a body.
2. Water is not completely incompressible.

On earth, anyway, these two considerations are essentially irrelevant, but they may not be on your hypothetical other planet.
To phrase it another way - if I had a body of water large enough to swim in in a microgravity environment - would the water offer any resistance as I swam through it?

Do issues of surface tension, friction, viscosity and so so on play a significant role in determining water pressure?
Yes! (to both questions) Resistance to motion in water has nothing to do with the pressure of the water (same caveats as above, though). The resistance (and this goes for air too) is based on the density and viscosity of the fluid, and sometimes compressibility.

Surface tension, itself will only affect motion on the surface.

We may move this thread...
 
i always wondered how pressure as a function of depth was affected by irregular containers. i keep thinking of sensible ways to calculate it that give absurd results in certain configurations
 
Thank you, Russ. One further question about your statement below:


russ_watters said:
Yes! (to both questions) Resistance to motion in water has nothing to do with the pressure of the water (same caveats as above, though). The resistance (and this goes for air too) is based on the density and viscosity of the fluid, and sometimes compressibility.

Surface tension, itself will only affect motion on the surface.

Since water is very slightly compressible - and that compression, in a natural deep water environment, would come from the weight of the water - would I expect somewhat less water resistance in a lower gravity environment?
 
Water is essentially incompressible, meaning that the difference in figures like "water resistance," by which I assume you mean drag, are only affected in a negligible way. You are correct, though, that the slight compressibility means that deep water is denser than shallow water, even with all other factors like temperature held constant. Denser water means, of course, more drag on a submersible vehicle. Again though, this effect is so tiny that it can be ignored, even on other planets.

- Warren
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top