Is the Relativistic Law for Adding Velocities Associative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeroBlade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Relativistic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the associativity of the Relativistic Law for adding velocities, expressed as v1 + v2 = (v1 + v2) / (1 + (v1*v2/c^2)). The user seeks assistance with algebraic manipulation to demonstrate that (v1 + v2) + v3 equals v1 + (v2 + v3). Participants suggest multiplying both expressions by their common denominator to eliminate fractions, although they express skepticism about the numerators being equal after expansion. The user also explores the implications of velocities exceeding the speed of light, c, and confirms that for v1 and v2 less than c, their sum remains less than c. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of the algebra involved in proving the associativity of this relativistic velocity addition law.
NeroBlade
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey folks I've been having trouble solving this assignment and I'm not sure whether my solutions is correct or in the right direction.
The one question just need help doing the fraction rearranging to prove that the function is associative.

1. The Relativistic Law for adding velocities is v1 + v2 = (v1 + v2) / (1+((v1*v2)/c^2)) Show that:

Law is associative

I've thought of using (v1 + v2) + v3 = v1 + (v2 + v3) where

(v1 + v2) + v3 = ((v1 + v2)/(1 + (v1*v2/c^2)) + v3) / (1 + (((v1v2)/c^2)*v3) / c^2)

and

v1 + (v2 + v3) = ((v2 + v3)/(1 + (v2*v3/c^2)) + v1) / (1 + (((v2v3)/c^2)*v1) / c^2)

At this point I am stuck in regards of algebraically solving these two fractions.
Could any of you lend me a hand for this problem?

2.

v + c = c

I'm presume that you use one of the addition or multiplication axioms where the you either make v a neutral element
where you get to the point that v + c - c = 0 and v = 0 therefore v + c = 0 + c = c.

3.

If v1,v2 < c then v1 + v2 < c
For this one I've used the Relativistic Law and simulated what would happen if v1,v2 > c
(which is impossible as c is suppose to be the "Ultimate Velocity")
and work out c after for example v1 = 4, v2 = 5 and c = 2 and (v1 + v2)

How am I doing for these proofs are these right? If not what is missing?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply both expressions by their common denominator
c²(v1v2+c²)(v2v3+c²) to clear all the fractions. It will be messy, but possible, to see if the numerators are equal by expanding them out and collecting like terms. Hard to believe they will be equal!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top