MHB Is the Remainder of Polynomial $f(x)$ the Same for Two Different Divisors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the remainder of the polynomial f(x) = 2008 + 2007x + 2006x^2 + ... + 2x^2006 + x^2007 is identical when divided by the divisors x(x+1) and x(x+1)^2. Participants acknowledge a previous solution and express gratitude for contributions to the topic. The conversation highlights the mathematical approach to finding remainders in polynomial division. An additional solution is mentioned, indicating ongoing engagement with the problem. The focus remains on the equivalence of remainders for the specified divisors.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that the remainder of the polynomial $f(x)=2008+2007x+2006x^2+\cdots+3x^{2005}+2x^{2006}+x^{2007}$ is the same upon division by $x(x+1)$ as upon division by $x(x+1)^2$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$f(x)=2008+2007x+2006x^2+\cdots+3x^{2005}+2x^{2006}+x^{2007}$1st we provide the premise

this shall have same remainder when divided by $x(x+1)$ and $x(x+1)^2$

provided this shall have same remainder when divided by $(x+1)$ and $(x+1)^2$

when we divide by (x+1)^2 we shall have a linear polynomial say m(x+1) + c and when we divide by (x+1) it shall be d and both are same if m= 0 and m+c = d

so if we convert
f(x) as a polynomial of (x+1) the coefficient of x should be zero

or f(x-1) should have coefficient of x to be zero

now we provide the solution based on premise

$f(x-1)=2008+2007(x-1)+2006(x-1)^2+\cdots+3(x-1)^{2005}+2(x-1)^{2006}+(x-1)^{2007}$

should have coefficient of x to be zero

the coefficient of x
$= 2007 + 2006 * (-2) + 2005 * 3 \cdots + 2 * 2006 - 2007 = 0$

hence proved
 
kaliprasad said:
$f(x)=2008+2007x+2006x^2+\cdots+3x^{2005}+2x^{2006}+x^{2007}$1st we provide the premise

this shall have same remainder when divided by $x(x+1)$ and $x(x+1)^2$

provided this shall have same remainder when divided by $(x+1)$ and $(x+1)^2$

when we divide by (x+1)^2 we shall have a linear polynomial say m(x+1) + c and when we divide by (x+1) it shall be d and both are same if m= 0 and m+c = d

so if we convert
f(x) as a polynomial of (x+1) the coefficient of x should be zero

or f(x-1) should have coefficient of x to be zero

now we provide the solution based on premise

$f(x-1)=2008+2007(x-1)+2006(x-1)^2+\cdots+3(x-1)^{2005}+2(x-1)^{2006}+(x-1)^{2007}$

should have coefficient of x to be zero

the coefficient of x
$= 2007 + 2006 * (-2) + 2005 * 3 \cdots + 2 * 2006 - 2007 = 0$

hence proved

Ops, I want to apologize to kaliprasad for not replying to your solution earlier...sorry, Kali!:(

Thanks for your participation and your great solution by the way. :cool:

I have another solution that I want to share here with you and MHB:

We have that

$\begin{align*}f(x)&=2008+1004x+1003(x^3+2x^2+x)+\cdots+3(x^{2003}+2x^{2002}+x^{2001})+2(x^{2005}+2x^{2004}+x^{2003})+(x^{2007}+2x^{2006}+x^{2005})\\&=x(x+1)^2(1003+\cdots+3x^{2000}+2x^{2002}+x^{2004})+(1004x+2008)\end{align*}$

from which the result follows with remainder $1004x+2008$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top