Is the Scalar Product of Stress Tensors in Cartesian Components Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the scalar product of stress tensors expressed in Cartesian components. The user initially struggles with the expression σ·σ and questions how it can yield a scalar. After working through the components, they realize that using Kronecker deltas simplifies the expression to σ_{ij}^2, confirming it is indeed a scalar. The clarification emphasizes the importance of correctly applying tensor operations in Cartesian coordinates. The conclusion highlights that understanding the role of Kronecker deltas is crucial in this context.
The Alchemist
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



stress tensor in cartesian components.
\sigma is the stress tensor.
e_i are the basis vectors

Homework Equations



\sigma \cdot \sigma

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to write out the components with a cartesian basis:
\sigma=\sigma_{ij} (e_i \otimes e_j)
But then I'm stuck on
\sigma \cdot \sigma = \sigma_{ij} (e_i \otimes e_j) \cdot \sigma_{ji} (e_j \otimes e_i)

How can that be a scalar, since it is the scalar product...

I have no idea if this is the right approach, should I explicit use the unit vectors e_i to emphasize the cartesian components?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I made my way through this.

<br /> \sigma_{ij} (e_i \otimes e_j) \cdot \sigma_{kl} (e_k \otimes e_l) = \sigma_{ij} \delta_{ik} \delta_{jl} \sigma_{kl}<br /> = \sigma_{ij}^2<br />
This is indeed a scalar, since there is no tensor space to span.
The key was to create the kronecker deltas.

Thanks anyway.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top