Is the Schwarzschild metric dimensionless?

help1please
Messages
167
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is I am wanting to know if the expression on the right hand side is dimensionless.

Homework Equations



ds^2 = (1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r})c^2 dt^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the Schwarzschild radius is r = \frac{2GM}{c^2} would I be right in saying that

\frac{2GM}{c^2 r}

is dimensionless?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
help1please said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the Schwarzschild radius is r = \frac{2GM}{c^2} would I be right in saying that

\frac{2GM}{c^2 r}

is dimensionless?

Yes, it is.
 
Note that it would have to be if the formula is valid since you're subtracting that quantity from 1, which is dimensionless.
 
Of course it is. Note that sometime we write metric in this form:1-\frac{2GM}{r}
just a matter of unit conventions.
 
thanks every1
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top