Is the Speed Calculation for an Artificial Satellite Accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullroar_86
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the accuracy of the speed calculation for an artificial satellite traveling at 30,000 m/s at an altitude of 230 km, considering Earth's gravitational acceleration of 9.0 m/s². Participants debate the necessity of knowing the satellite's mass to determine its speed and centripetal acceleration. It is suggested that if the velocity is known and the trajectory is circular, the orbital period can be easily calculated. The consensus leans towards the idea that mass is not required for this specific calculation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the relationship between speed, altitude, and orbital mechanics.
bullroar_86
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Would you agree with the calculation reagarding the speed of an artificial satelite, v = 3 x 10^4 m/s, assuming that it is traveling at an altitude h = 230 km above the Earth's surface where g = 9.0 m/s^2. ?

The radius of the Earth is 6370 km.

Also, how long would it take for the satelite to complete one revolution?


not sure where to start here.. any help would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which force must provide the satelite's centripetal acceleration, and how does that force look like in the case where you are 230 km above the Earth's surface?
 
U can find its KE,but u still would have to know its mass in order to determine its speed (the modulus of its tangential velocity).

If u know the velocity & assume the trajectory is a circle whose radius u already know,then u can easily find the period,wouldn't u say...?

Daniel.

EDIT:Arildno's approach is the right one.You needn't the mass in this case...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top