Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've read one or two contradictory things about this. I was debating with a bloke recently who intensely disliked the Pauli principle, he seemed to think that something so important to the structure and stability of matter was somehow unsatisfactory if left as an ad hoc postulate. I was under the impression that spin statistics is not a postulate and was in fact derived from the relativistic version of QM. Unfortunately I won't be doing any relativistic QM, so I wonder if anyone here could tell me. Is there an explanation for spin statistics that makes sense, or is the only option the wade through the proof? (Or is it in fact a postulate?)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is the spin statistics theorem a postulate?

Loading...

Similar Threads - spin statistics theorem | Date |
---|---|

A Can Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem Apply to Magnetic Forces | Jul 21, 2016 |

Spin-Statistics Theorem | Aug 25, 2012 |

Spin statistic terms in absorption cross section | Aug 24, 2012 |

Spin-statistics theorem | Aug 12, 2007 |

Spin-statistics theorem | Mar 12, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**