bigplanet401
- 101
- 0
I don't know what to say. sqrt(4) = +/- 2, but constants are fixed. When written sqrt(4), it seems sqrt(4) is a constant, but not in the latter case. Help!
The discussion centers around the nature of the square root of 4, specifically whether it can be considered a constant. Participants explore the implications of the square root notation, the definitions involved, and the distinctions between different mathematical contexts.
Participants express differing views on whether sqrt(4) should be considered a constant, with some asserting it is definitively 2 while others maintain that it encompasses both 2 and -2 in different contexts. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of functions and the implications of mathematical notation, which are not fully explored or agreed upon by participants.
bigplanet401 said:I don't know what to say. sqrt(4) = +/- 2, but constants are fixed. When written sqrt(4), it seems sqrt(4) is a constant, but not in the latter case. Help!
A better way to solve the equation ##x^2 = 4## is to write it as ##x^2 - 4 = 0## or (x - 2)(x + 2) = 0, from which we get x = 2 or x = -2. No funny business with taking the square root of both sides needed.jack476 said:No, square root of 4 is 2 and only 2, but 2^2 OR (-2)^2 will be equal to 4.
So if you're confronted with something like √x =2, then x is 4. The square root function cannot return a negative real number.
On the other hand, if you've got x^2 = 4, then both x = 2 and x = -2 are valid solutions to that algebraic equation. If you were to solve that equation by taking the square root of both sides, you would have to include x = -2 along with the x = 2 that would be returned by that operation because, unlike the square root function, the squaring function has values for all real numbers.