Is the tangential acceleration component always zero(wheel?)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the tangential acceleration of a point on a wheel rolling down a hill without slipping. It is established that while the velocity at the contact point is zero, the tangential acceleration is not necessarily zero due to the nature of derivatives. The participants analyze the motion using parametric equations, concluding that the tangential acceleration remains zero at the instant the wheel contacts the ground, aligning with the exam solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between angular velocity and tangential acceleration in dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, specifically dynamics.
  • Familiarity with parametric equations and their derivatives.
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its role in rotational motion.
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between angular acceleration and tangential acceleration in rolling motion.
  • Learn about the implications of non-slip conditions in rotational dynamics.
  • Explore the use of parametric equations in modeling motion in physics.
  • Investigate the effects of gravity on rolling objects on inclined planes.
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering dynamics courses, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the mechanics of rolling motion and acceleration analysis.

x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
If a wheel is rolling down a hill without slipping then we know the contact point has zero velocity.

Is it also true that the tangential acceleration of this point is zero too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try computing it?
 
Orodruin said:
Why don't you try computing it?

Ok well,

The velocity at point A is zero, V_A = 0

So d(V_A)/dt = (a_t)_A = 0

Therefore the tangential acceleration is zero at this instant.

Is this correct? It is kind of weird, because then how would the wheel continue turning?
 
No, it is not correct. The velocity is on momentarily zero and the derivative of a function which is zero at a given point may still be non-zero (take the derivative of x with respect to x at x = 0 for example).

Can you describe how the position of a given point on the wheel (in a reasonable coordinate system) depends on time?
 
Orodruin said:
No, it is not correct. The velocity is on momentarily zero and the derivative of a function which is zero at a given point may still be non-zero (take the derivative of x with respect to x at x = 0 for example).

Can you describe how the position of a given point on the wheel (in a reasonable coordinate system) depends on time?

I don't know any physics theory. I'm taking a dynamics course in engineering and its really applied, but this concept is one that I'm curious about because on a previous exam there was a question about a wheel rolling down a hill without slipping, and there was a point P that connects the ground and wheel. The question was what was the acceleration of the point P, and the answer only used the normal component of the wheel, and said the tangent component was 0.

Altough, I just wrote my calculus 2 final exam so I'm going to try and do some calculus and to give your question a try using what I know, I don't think the n-t coordinate system will be helpful because it has nothing to do with position.

But I think I can describe the position with parametric equations. If we start from the top of the wheel , then we know its coordinates are x = rsinwt, y = rcoswt (w is angular velocity)

So taking the derivatives

x' = wrcoswt
y' = -wrsinwt

x'' = -w^2rsinwt
y'' = -w^2rcoswt

When the top point of the wheel touches the ground, then it has rotated 180 degrees, so (wt) = pi

Then x'' = 0 and y'' = rw^2

Meaning that this point P is only moving up at this exact point

Since in n-t coordinate system, "up" is y which is n, "left/right" is x which is t

But our "left/right" is 0. So the only acceleration is "up" So this has to mean there is no tangential acceleration, only normal

This conclusion agrees with the exam solution too, and I'm pretty confident with it.

Even though we'd have some new term inside our sin/cos wave changing the angular velocity (due to a gravity component), I'm going to say its the same even when we have a hill, just because the exam answer sort of implied this.

EDIT: But to do some further calculus, if its rolling down a hill and accelerating without slipping

r is radius, p is the angular acceleration due to gravity

x = rsin[ (w + pt)t ] = rsin[ wt + pt^2 ]
y = rcos[ (w + pt)t ] = rcos[ wt + pt^2 ]

x' = [ wt + pt^2 ]' rcos[ wt + pt^2 ] = wrcos[ wt + pt^2 ] + 2ptrcos[ wt + pt^2 ]
y' = [ wt + pt^2 ]' -rsin[ wt + pt^2 ] = -wtrsin[ wt + pt^2 ] - 2ptrsin[ wt + pt^2 ]

Wow, this is getting messy fast. I'm going to assume y'' is nonzero and only calculate x''

x'' = -wr(w+2pt)sin[ wt + pt^2 ] + 2prcos[ wt + pt^2 ] - 2ptrsin[ wt + pt^2 ]

When [ wt + pt^2 ] = pi

x'' = 0 + 2pr - 0

Ok, x is nonzero, it shouldn't be... because the normal component is tangent to the hill.

So I'm just going to assume the tangent component is zero based off of the exam answer
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K