Is the Time Required to Travel D Miles at S MPH the Same as D/2 Miles at 2S MPH?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the time to travel distance D at speed S is the same as traveling D/2 at speed 2S. The correct formula for time is time = distance/speed, leading to time = D/S for the first scenario and time = (D/2)/(2S) for the second, which simplifies to D/4S. This shows that the time for the first scenario is greater, as D/S is not equal to D/4S. The conversation also emphasizes understanding the relationship between distance, speed, and time through their units.
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
which is greater or are they equal

1) the time required to travel d miles at s miles per hour

or

2) the time required to travel d/2 miles at 2s miles per hour


I thought 1) is equivalent to d*s or ds

and I thought 2) is equivalent to

d/2 * 2s

which simplifies to

ds

so they're the same but my book says 1) is greater
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose Adam travels at 10 mph. He wants to travel 40 miles. How long will it take him?
Suppose Bob travels 20 mph. He wants to travel 20 miles. How long will it take him?
 
The problem you're having here is that the time required to travel distance d at speed s is d/s, not d*s.
 
d/s = t, so rearranging this we get d = st

If the options were instead:

1) the distance traveled after t hours at s miles per hour

2) the distance traveled after t/2 an hour at 2s miles per hour

Then they would be equal, because using the rearranged equation we have

1) d = s*t
2) d = 2s*t/2 = s*t

Oh and by the way, to remember this equation, it should just be intuitive but if you can't do that, think about the units! Distance is measured in miles (or equivalent), time is measured in hours, and speed is measured in miles/hour. So from this you can quickly tell that speed = distance / time since miles per hour means miles / hours.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top