Is the Universe Flat or Does it Have a Height?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jhe1984
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the universe's flatness and its height. "Flat" refers to the universe's geometric properties rather than its physical shape, indicating that it follows Euclidean geometry. Participants question whether there are measurable height differences in the universe, particularly in relation to Earth. The idea of a tallest or lowest point is explored, suggesting that height could be assessed along specific lines. Overall, the conversation clarifies that flatness does not imply a disk-like shape but rather uniform geometric characteristics.
jhe1984
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
As the question hints at, how tall is the universe?

I know it is thought to be flat, but what is its height?

Furthermore, are there regions that are taller than others?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
jhe1984 said:
As the question hints at, how tall is the universe?

I know it is thought to be flat, but what is its height?

Furthermore, are there regions that are taller than others?

Thanks

"Flat" refers to its geometric properties not its physical shape.
 
Hmm - not sure I follow. By geometrically "flat" do you mean that any two regions have the same geometric properties, everything else being equal?

Back to the question, isn't there a tallest and lowest point (relative to Earth, I guess) and wouldn't you be able to measure height along these lines?
 
I could not explain it better than Space Tiger did. "Flat" does not mean that the universe is shaped like a large disk. "Flat" means that the geometric properties (such as the sum of the angles equaling 180) are Euclidian.
 
Cool. Thanks yall
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top