Is the Yukawa Strong Nuclear Flux dependent on both gauge and radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton Monopole
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3

What is the solution for a static graviton flux monopole through a closed surface? :rolleyes:

Sphere surface area:
dA = 4 \pi r^2
\Phi_G = \oint G_g \cdot dA = \oint G_g \cdot (4 \pi r^2)
[/Color]
 
Physics news on Phys.org

G_g is the gravitic field strength: (arbitrarily chosen symbol)
G_g
[/Color]
 
Are you talking about arbitrary closed surface or about sphere. If you are talking about sphere then it is quite simple:
First thing: Flux is \Phi=\oint_S \vec{G} \vec{dA}. Second thing \vec{dA} in spherical coordinates (which are most appropriate because problem has a spherical simmetry) is \vec{dA}=R^2\sin\theta d\phi d\theta\vec{e_r}. Integration is trivial because \vec{G}=\frac{\gamma m}{R^2}\vec{e_r}.
In case of arbitrary surface we have \oint_A \vec{G}\vec{dA'}=\int_V \nabla\vec{G}dV'=-\int_V \nabla^2{\phi_g}dV'=-\gamma m\int_V \nabla^2\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|} dV'=4\pi\gamma m\int_V \delta(\vec{r}-\vec{r'})dV'=4\pi\gamma m, where V is such that A=\partial V.
 
Last edited:

G_g = \frac{\gamma m}{r^2}

Gauss' Law for gravitation:
\Phi_g = - \left( \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \right) (4 \pi r^2) = - 4 \pi \gamma m
\boxed{\Phi_g = - 4 \pi \gamma m}

\Phi_g = \oint_A \vec{G} \vec{dA} = - \oint_A \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \vec{e_r} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi d\theta \vec{e_r} = - \gamma m \int_a^b \left[ \int_c^d \sin \theta d\phi \right] d\theta}
\boxed{\Phi_g = - \gamma m \int_a^b \left[ \int_c^d \sin \theta d\phi \right] d\theta}
[/Color]
 
Last edited:
First expression you wrote is meaningless. You should have some differential form under integration. Expression would be OK if you had integral sign removed. Third expression is OK but you didn't perform integration. You should integrate \theta in boundaries from 0 to \pi and \phi in boundaries from 0 to 2\pi.
 

\Phi_g = \oint_S \vec{G} \vec{dA} = - \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \vec{e_r} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi \vec{e_r} \right] d\theta

- \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \vec{e_r} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi \vec{e_r} \right] d\theta = - \gamma m \int_0^{\pi} \int_0^{2 \pi} \sin \theta d\phi d\theta = -2 \pi \gamma m \int_0^{\pi} \sin \theta d\theta

-2 \pi \gamma m \int_0^{\pi} \sin \theta d\theta = - 4 \pi \gamma m
\boxed{\Phi_g = - 4 \pi \gamma m}
[/Color]
 
Last edited:

These are my equations for Yukawa Flux.

g - gauge coupling constant
S_n - Yukawa strong nuclear field strength

Yukawa Strong Nuclear Flux:
S_n = - \frac{g}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}} r^2}
\Phi_n = \oint_S S_n dA = - \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{g}{ e^{\frac{r}{r_0}} r^2} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi \right] d\theta = - g \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\sin \theta}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}} d\phi \right] d\theta

- g \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\sin \theta}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}} d\phi \right] d\theta = - 2 \pi g \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin \theta}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}} d\theta = - \frac{4 \pi g}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}}

\boxed{\Phi_n = - \frac{4 \pi g}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}}}

However, every other flux through a closed surface, such as Maxwell's equations and Gauss' Law for gravitation is only dependent on gauge. This flux equation is dependent on both gauge and radius. Are these equations correct?
[/Color]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top