Is there a connection between pi and e in this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hans de Vries
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Hans de Vries
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
31
Almost pi ...

What is the solution to:

\mbox{ $\frac{1}{2}$}\ \mbox{\Huge e}^{\ \frac{1}{2}X^2}\ -\ 2\ \mbox{\Huge e}^{\ 2X^{1/2}}\ =\ \left(\frac{1}{2} \right)^2}
Answer: x = 3.1415935362596164657060129064942...

Almost pi, the difference is only 2.8 10-7.
Now, is this a coincidence or is there an explanation?
Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You should look at other examples to guess what the answer is.
Try solving:

f(x)-f(1/x) = (1/x)^x

for different functions f, and see how often youget near to pi.
 
That's an interesting find hans. I'd say it's just coincidence but I'd be very interested to see any other ideas on this.

BTW. For anyone wanting to solve the equation for themselves and test han's claim, it is amendable to fix-point iteration as in :

x = sqrt( 2 log( 1/2 + 4 exp(2 sqrt(x) ) ) )

BTW. It's actually more like 8.8 \times 10^{-7} away from Pi, but it's still pretty close. :)
 
Last edited:
One can say that this is just a first term of some infinite series or iteration for pi we don't know about.
 
Some amazing rapidly converging one too, but I doubt it. If a forum like us can realize this, surely mathematicians would have. And I know they haven't because this would prove pi and e are not algebraically independent, which is an open problem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top